Not a bad strategy, tbh.

True, fair, and open minded. But if that were the case, though, then the question wouldn’t need to be asked.

I can’t wait for nazi rapists are cool 4, everyone should have to host it and support its financial transactions.

Buying an indie platformer that you might not play is not anywhere close to actual IRL hording. And it’s not even what is being described as digital hording in that article from UCLA.

It’s straight up irresponsible to compare it to an actual hording mental disorder. Like, you must not have ever experienced that in any capacity to think that.

Although, surely digital horders have some cross over. But the prevalence of people not playing a game they bought on discount ain’t it fam.

Both great metrics to have, true.

Short term and long term impacts are both worthy of study, surely.

Good example! That poll would be a relevant result for a percent of the population the believes in god.

Yes, it does. A subjective response can absolutely be an objective result.

You can conclude that teachers experience a better classroom environment. There was also 1/3 that did observe academic improvement.

E: Also, a teachers subjective experience is still an objective result if you are considering the qol aspect of the policy.

That’s another type of study that is also worthwhile. But the effects of distracted students on teachers and the classroom as a whole is also relevant.

Who better to poll than teachers for this type of study? They are the ones in the trenches and can gauge the results.

Or a lot of minecraft fans are adults now.

Wholesome AF right here.

But snakes can’t wear necklaces, people are such idiots!

Back pain, anxiety, and insomnia all predate modern times by a lot. Not that it isn’t worth being conscious of modern balancing efforts.

I exercise or play sports at least 3 times a week (baseball, skating, disc golf, gym) and eat fast food less than once a month ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Ya, kinda and it is a pretty funny answer. Jack uses a slightly different process called the Lincoln county process. Basically, they filter it through charcoal made from maple wood.

That still meets the requirements for Bourbon, but they wanted to have their own “Tennessee whiskey” definition that includes the Lincoln process. Although, I don’t know who else uses it other than them and Dickle.

So, ya, bourbon subset that doesn’t want to be called bourbon because it’s Tennessee whiskey. Lol.

Ya, that’s because it’s not Bourbon. Which kinda proves the point, right.

Lol, what? You are just riding on some xenophobia tip or something. You know the fact that there is a ton of American whiskey that is not called bourbon kinda disproves your whole prejudice, right? Whatever, keep stewing in it I guess.