Other examples of “terrorist” groups that never killed anyone :

Making Palestine Action a terrorist group for “injuring” war planes used in a genocide(, or a unilateral massacre of civilians for those refusing to use a word abused in Lybia or systematically in our wars,) is just further proof that terrorism doesn’t mean anything, and more&more people realize that.
And yeah, i know that it wasn’t their first actions, but we shouldn’t use the same terms&laws for those refusing to kill :

https://youtu.be/lJw0ni1Q01k

On tariffs, i found that interesting : https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1910512816253263904

As well as this comment : https://x.com/ZhaiXiang5/status/1909985319753036112 :

Yeah well, fuck David Ricardo(, it’s obvious that we should buy&produce locally, his counter-intuitive results are only valid from a consumer viewpoint, not taking into account the jobs created, the taxes collected by the state, the more secondary enterprises benefiting indirectly from a good economic health, …), he was only used to justify a neo-colonialist “free trade” locking “poor”(exploited) countries into selling raw materials, as well as selling the ownership of their companies/mines/‘natural resources’, etc.
Their invaluable ressources were formed over (hundreds of )millions of years and are now sold over a few decades at a very low price set by the market according to the competition(, which isn’t the case for the more advanced manufactured products with less competition, such as selling planes instead of t-shirts).
So fuck David Ricardo, and these countries should ABSOLUTELY agree together to form an economic(&military because coups would follow,) alliance to raise in a concerted manner the prices of their raw materials, who should be at the very least 10, if not 100, times higher, and then use that money to manufacture these objects themselves. But they won’t, tsk, so w/e.
D.Trump is right in his desire to get back american companies in the u.s.a., even if he only did so once he stopped benefiting from it, the u.s. is too powerful to be oppressed for such decisions, unlike :

• Haiti in the 1980-1990s, who tried to protect its rice, but the unholy trinity forced them to give up on that measure, and Miami’s rice quickly took over, assholes ;
• Before the 1980s, Ghana produced its own clothes, but because of the western SAPs, they were forced to buy clothes from Europe and Asia and lost their textile industry ;
• In Argentina during the 2000s, Kirchner also tried some protectionnism like China, but as usual the unholy trinity came to order people around, the US, EU, and Japan added to the criticism of the WHO, and commercial pressures forced them to change their mind ;
• Tanzania also tried to do the same for its agriculture, etc.

I won’t forget that the People’s Republic of China was the only non-western aligned country to ever emerge since the colonization(, South Korea and Japan’s rise were only strategic, we helped them at our expense like Israel or Taiwan), and also one of the only ones who refused to follow western advices/orders(, i still consider them protectionnism even if they complied — unwillingly in 1842, 1858, 1860, … ; willingly in the 1980s — with our demands on tariffs, because they :

• subsidized their economy ;
• ‘obtained, through explicit demands of real partnerships unlike the more submissive(trusting?) global South,’&‘are now improving upon’ western technologies, as well as creating new ones(, they were faster) ;
• had reglementations such as forbidding foreign investments in some sectors past a certain percentage ;
• favored local companies for state projects ;
• …
  They’ve demonstrated the unprecedented success of their system/‘set of conditions’, and should be imitated by the Global South if it’s indeed better/‘validated by these last decades’. And the chinese civilization has only just started to marvel us if you also like techno-scientific discoveries).

Fuck Ricardo.

More arguments here, among many books.

One day he’s criticized for saying that Hitler was a communist, the other for apparently assuming his love of nazis.
There’s an old series of books by Terry Goodkind that i’ve read as a child, named the Sword of Truth, each book has a wizard’s rule, and here’s the first one :

People are stupid. They believe things mainly because they either want them to be true or fear them to be true.

I’m not particularly fond of these books nor do i agree with this rule, but if you’re political then you’re judging real political actions, such as enacted laws, like adults do, or you’re eventually discussing assumed theories, but not unfair little excerpts regretted afterwards by the one who did them, and we can hopefully both agree that we should not explain our worldview or vote based on the latter, its ‘just for fun’/‘not serious’.
At least most journalists know that it’s only about influencing his future decisions, but you don’t if you believe it was ‘a coming out’/‘something to be discussed seriously’.
That’s just my two cents, thanks for reading my insults towards ~you, and let’s continue not changing.

conspiracy theorists taking us for idiots, nothing new(, even if you’re taking it quite farther than usual).

On the side of real stuff happening : D.Trump said a lot in his inauguration speech, and just put Cuba back on the terrorist states list, as well as signing over twenty executive orders, etc. Seems worth more discussion than your fantasies.

Just unfortunate that, like for D.Trump, you’re too used to discussing the form instead of the content, we’re worth more than selected/biased excerpts.

No.

I’ve donated 15€/month(, and i’m really fucking poor(, by choice, to have more free time to code), no joke, it’s rare that i have more than 1000€ on my account)(, more importantly/relevantly, alternative newspapers or humanitarian associations need this money much more).
The thing is that despite donating i think that it’ll be a waste, because you won’t deliver, you’re already struggling to give us meager updates, and only once a month. Please make an announcement of the future implementations with your monthly updates, and/or make it a weekly announcement.

And/Or have a “public bounty” for a given implementation, with a list of them and the possibility to vote, and also the possibility to make a one-time donation to increase this specific bounty.

I know it’s worse for other social medias or apps, who almost completely stopped evolving despite having larger funds, i’m harsh on purpose and only pretend to care. Yet i believe that they’re wrong, and hence that you’re wrong as well.
I hope that you haven’t suddenly become lazy, or more realistically scared by the amount of work you still have to do(, only a vague sense of duty left without supervision, i guess). You should aim to implement at least one new feature every day(, and probably know, or knew in the past, that it’s the correct mindset).

And if these implementations don’t motivate you, ask publicly Lemmy users for ideas(, with(out) guidelines), they’ll have a ton of them, and could even vote once again in a list to select the most desired features.

Je m’attendais pas à récolter des assentiments(, merci pour ta réponse du coup), mais oui, la liste est longue, et les quelques exemples que j’ai cité auraient d’ailleurs dû être mieux développés.

Si la plupart des gens ici sont sur jlailu ou sh.itjust.works, alors je ne pense pas que ce soit nécessaire, mais je ferais attention à ça la prochaine fois, et peut-être que je ferais alors aussi un doublon sur monde@jlailu si le thème est similaire(, et les doublons autorisés). Merci pour ta réponse.

Peut-être oui, mais il est officiellement moins subjectif que je ne le croyais initialement : https://twitter.com/EmmanuelMacron, après ce n’était pas vraiment dirigé contre lui, j’ai surtout cessé de comprendre le point de vue adverse et j’aimerais bien corriger ça(, non pas que cela aura un impact sur ces nombreuses morts inutiles d’innocents, juste par “curiosité” personnelle, pas plus/moins inutile qu’autre chose).
Bien sûr je peux continuer de lire des articles mais une fois que leurs arguments n’ont plus de valeur(, comme avec J.Assange parmi tant d’exemples, où si je veux bien concéder(, comme lui, pour les prénoms&noms,) que certaines choses ne devraient pas être publiées, le point de vue de supprimer toutes les révélations est absurde,) il ne me reste que le débat avec d’autres personnes.

Ah flûte, je n’y avais pas pensé. Je ne pense pas que j’aurais eu ma réponse de toute manière, tu penses que ça vaut le coup que je fasse un nouveau sujet avec un compte de lemmy.world ?

Unless the creatures, overall, would prefer to have never existed in the first place, then the Creator isn’t evil and should be praised(, that’s only one reason, for example an other one would be our search for Absolute/Greatness/Good/…)

tu penses qu’elle devrait être encore plus étoffée

Étant donné qu’il y aurait un ajout/semaine à faire en période creuse(, près d’un ajout/jour en temps normal,) et que cela dure depuis des décennies, alors oui.
Je réitère que les israélien.ne.s ne sont pas non plus dans une situation confortable, mais c’était à souligner en raison de l’accusation unilatérale de terrorisme.

Imaginons que je reçoive un contre-argument :

Mais tu peux pas dire ça !

Vers une dissolution de Human Rights Watch ? https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed/israeli-authorities-and-crimes-apartheid-and-persecution#8565

Pas sûr de comprendre pourquoi cette page wikipedia est vide : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_war_crimes_against_Israel, mais vous aurez compris l’idée.
Pas sûr non plus qu’il était nécessaire d’imaginer un commentaire pour y répondre, et oui je comprends que la situation d’Israël est précaire et qu’ils sont en position de survie, mais si l’on offre aucune autre alternative aux palestinien.ne.s que d’accepter leur perte sans rien avoir d’équivalent en échange, et si l’on continue de mentir en prétendant favoriser une solution à deux états(, très clairement pas le choix d’Israël, probablement pas celui des palestinien.ne.s non plus), alors arrêtez de croire que la paix est désirable puisqu’elle ne favorisera que l’oppresseur. Il faut offrir quelque chose d’équivalent aux palestinien.ne.s, ça commence par là, et ce nouveau territoire palestinien ne peux venir que de l’ouest agresseur, pas des pays arabes défenseurs.

Encore une preuve que le terme “terrorisme” ne veut rien dire, s’ils pensent objectif de l’attribuer aux palestinien.ne.s plutôt qu’aux israëlien.ne.s.

One post and zero comment from criitz.
Ideally a fusion of Reddit and Lemmy’s content was what your bot is aiming to do, first thought it’d be illegal, but since we don’t have human reposters i’m glad there’s at least a bot instead.

I don’t entirely agree with my comment either, because there’s multiple interpretation of Hell.
One of them is interesting, it says that if our consciousness survives after our death, our mind will finally think clearly, we’ll remember our past better than if it happened today, and we’ll be overwhelmed by shame, this hell would be created by ourselves.
Another one would talk about a real place, but not in the afterlife but right here, on Earth(, it combines perfectly with this talk of afterlife if you believe in reincarnation), and says that if we all live our lives ‘searching for’/‘aiming at’ God, then our descendants/reincarnations will live in Paradise(, or in Hell if we don’t).
There’re other interpretations, as well as the thought that we’re not free since we’re determined, so God decided before our birth whether we would end up in Hell or in Paradise, a thought discussed in the Middle-Ages and rejected in favor of free-will(, i don’t think Spinoza would disagree with the conclusion that God predestined us for Hell, if he believed in Hell).
Obviously, the most common explanation is that police(wo)men didn’t existed back then, God-fearing people was the equivalent of virtuous people, even when nobody can see/stop them.

They merely said that being separated from God means suffering, while following H…er.im means walking towards the establishment of H…er.is Kingdom/City unto Earth. They talked more about Hell as a state than as a physical place, but, well… who cares nowadays, right ? Parabola never taught us anything about the real world, the spirit doesn’t exist, and morals are relative, they were simply naive ignorants who never had anything to teach us, embrace modernity and reject 100% of the past.

anyone who worships God is also good by default, and of course this logic follows that anyone that doesn’t worship God is evil by default.

If that was the case they wouldn’t put an emphasis on hypocrites.

Justice≠Revenge, otherwise Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, and the rest, would be justified.
If every evil was stopped though it would be the end of ‘our trip’/‘any possible progress’.

Progressivement…

On oublie pas la loi Avia, ni toutes ces lois antiterroristes utilisées pour d’autres personnes que Daesh, ce battage médiatique autour du harcèlement scolaire est juste une autre porte d’entrée(, juste avant le passage de la loi, quelle coïncidence ! Pas comme s’il y avait des conséquences à la manipulation donc pourquoi se priver).