Plenty of approaches that don’t destroy the book. These are years old solutions. They weren’t first editions, but the point was there was no human with any archivist training making the decisions to destroy all the books. It was a free for all.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03ccxwNssmo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLznMkyrCR4

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/systematic-review-of-systematic-reviews-of-acupuncture/

Always fails upon a closer look.

I love how the 2014 followup showed that 100% of studies out of China are positive. It is just a marketing gimmick for industry.

That means it is probably the patient/practitioner interaction that is doing the work…placebo

One is repeat users and the other is new potential users. This is two different type of users. It is probably expected that repeat users outnumber new users

I’m sorry are we putting aside biometric infomation being aggregated across multiple platforms and assigned to browsing habits so that governments know exactly where you’re browsing at any single moment?

Are we just putting that aside???

If discord can’t handle it don’t blame me. I mean what even is this point???

This can’t be true. It must be a lie. Mark said he didn’t want Meta to be arbiters of truth, and I know Mark will remain firm on that point, never wavering.