

What other states other than California has it?


What other states other than California has it?


Maybe denial is the new word for club?


I’m sorry, the contract has already been signed.


It would, because desktop users are a lot easier to infect than servers. They might be a lot less valuable than servers, but at the same time, they are much less secure. I’m sure there are plenty of people who would prefer going for the easier targets if there is enough of them to make up for the smaller value.


I’m comment stalking you by replying to two of your comments in the same thread? Really? Don’t flatter yourself, bro. That is textbook narcissistic behaviour you’re showing right there.


All doctors have degrees, yet nobody with common sense would say trust all doctors without doubt. Some would even say a doctor that tries to diagnose people through a few comments online are definitely in the category of those that shouldn’t be trusted.


Should we trust someone called Angry_Autist on how black and white we should treat the human psyche? Probably not.


Are they? Damn.


Why 3 Doors Down?


What makes you think this doesn’t apply to Mastodon instances?


But they already lost the advantage they had. The point of the retaliatory tariffs are not to make money, but to send a message.
They’ve already sent a message that they can tolerate Trump’s bullshit as long as it doesn’t hurt them too much when they backed down on the digital service tax.
Bringing it back now is a lot less effective than implementing it the first time around while still hurting Canadians the same amount.


Sounds like a good thing, honestly.


That article has a lot of reaching between the proof it claims and its conclusion.


Yeah, it does make it racist, but which party is performing the racist act? The AI, the AI trainer, the data collector, or the system that prioritises white patients? That’s the important distinction that simply calling it racist fails to address.


Haha, don’t project your own problems onto me, man.


You’re still confusing the two sentences. Haah, why do I even bother?


Can you not tell the difference between the sentence “blame him for being a man” with “blame all his problems on him being a man”?
True, both are sexist, but they literally mean different things. You’re just proving again how you can’t read.


Try reading from the start again, and maybe you’d finally be able to grasp some form of understanding. Good luck.
Thanks for the source.