They want to return to 1950s, but they will return to 1930s. And not only in Germany. Stupid people have no clue what dictators always do.
Who?
Says who?
I’d argue that the system shouldn’t automatically convert negative numbers to positive numbers. Instead, it should display an error to the user. Of course, that’s an abstract thought as I don’t know what was the system and who interacted with it.
And if you are an amateur yourself, you have no means to validate that the scripts aren’t harmful.
Why would I want to track his jet though?
Pear to pear communication.
Don’t some try to locate public access points nearby? Or is it just an internet myth?
Here, take it: )
I tried filters on other platforms, the results weren’t that good. Yes, you blocked a word, but people often use images with text for some reason, and filters don’t work with them.
Yeah, any business would have to either accept this request or leave the market. Jack Dorsey has no relation to that.
But they can use some other instance. With centralized platforms the issue is that they want to do business everywhere. Russia threatened to arrest Google employees in Moscow, for instance. Even without such threats, they want to have access to local markets. That isn’t a concern for some instance in Ireland that is supported by donations.
It’s a common dictionary, which is probably not very good in this context. I think it would be more appropriate to refer to ISTQB, as it is likely the most relevant source when it comes to software testing and failures:
Human beings make errors (mistakes), which produce defects (faults, bugs), which in turn may result in failures. Humans make errors for various reasons, such as time pressure, complexity of work products, processes, infrastructure or interactions, or simply because they are tired or lack adequate training
Or to put it simple:
We’re seeing a failure here.
What costs money is testing phases, including a lab to hold and propogate immortal cell lines and later production lines to create enough doses for thousands of human trials.
Thank you. These arguments are always hard to read. Sure, small labs are where it usually starts, but without enormous and risky investments, we would never have the drugs we have today. Most of these investments fail miserably, so one successful drug must cover the costs of ten unsuccessful ones. Nobody would do that if their IP weren’t protected. It’s more about reputation than facts when it comes to this topic.
Sure. It’s better to develop this habit and use them automatically, without thinking. Sometimes there are no cars around, but pedestrians want to know your intentions too. And even if you don’t see anyone, it doesn’t mean there’s nobody around.
It’s just git isn’t good/perfect software. Best pieces of software are made within a week.
Because people choose the easiest question to answer. You can’t change people, but you can change how you communicate.
Believe it or not, straight to hell.