Might be easier to make a white list.

As a “mathematician”… Yeah this is phony AF. Typical “AI” bullshit.

The field of application of Grothendieck’s toposes goes beyond the strictly mathematical framework. It makes it possible to connect literary works, which seem at first glance to have nothing in common, as evidenced by the connection between Homer’s The Iliad, Kurāʿ’s al-Muntakhab and Dostoyevsky’s The Idiot. This connection could in turn enrich research on topos, if it is taken seriously as an archeology [20], which invites to deepen the knowledge of things beyond binary oppositions to explore how things are formed

lmao. fraud. Foucault is cool and all, but dude was not writing about categories and sheaves. Not even close.

With Poincaré, we discover that building a bridge between things –a topos– can arise from an intuition

lol no. They can’t just call anything a “topos”. That’s not how math works. This paper is entertaining but that’s about it.

c/europe

which of these would you choose if you had to pick one?

Neither. What kind of creep are you putting me in this situation?

How you can you suspect the angel who wrote these lyrics? \s

Ba dang dang bang dong wank dinga dinga booga boog dang winga…

never was.

Nobody is quoting “scripture” because it doesn’t give a crap.

Unfortunately there are lots of preachers who have demonstrated this.

This comment reads like someone who defends that euphemism for pedophelia… Thankfully I can’t even remember the word.

Although he’s done lots of terrible things… His music is among the worst.

It actually mattes what shitty “analogy” he uses, because he’s implicitly endorsing prohibition and its ongoing, extreme violence. It’s a typical hegemonic tactic to normalize state violence. Dude is an alumni of the nytimes ofc. This is literally his whole career.

Another shill for the NYTimes… Check their op/ed pages. Full of worthless libs saying dumb shit.

He won the nobel prize for economics and was one of the few sane voices during the great recession.

There is no nobel prize for economics. It’s an even phonier prize made up by bankers. Even if there were an actual nobel, that’s no reason for believing anybody’s opinions far outside their realm of expertise (eg. krugman here).

More importantly krugman has been consistently liberal trash since forever.

If someone says that their grandchildren are perfect little angles, you don’t say “well, actually, angels are divine beings who don’t dwell upon this earth Grandma,

Nobody is murdering angels in the global south. This perspective is a privileged delusion.

The victims of prohibition are real people who are actually being violently attacked.

You do know that the entire rest of the article never mentions drugs ever again

Because the headline is clickbait bullshit… because the author is a grifter.

Paul Krugman is a nobel-prize winning economist who used to have a column in the NY Times.

Aka totally discredited.

The “nobel in econ” is as much of a fraud as econ in general.

Anybody who knows this goofball knows not to listen to his crap.

Only if they attack unrelated people that the racist orange rapist doesn’t like.

The usual bullshit Krugman clickbait.

Krugman is a worthless hack. Sensational headline with implicit endorsement of prohibition is a prime example.

Edit about the “nobel”: Everybody who’s talking about this “nobel prize”. There is no nobel prize in econ. It’s a phony award made up by bankers. That’s how pathetic the pseudo-science of economics is. They need to make up their own fake awards for relevancy. So please don’t tout the phony awards of this pseudo-scientists. I could make up an award for flat earthers but that wouldn’t legitimize flat earthism.

(And even if there were a nobel for econ… Who cares about awards if the underlying “science” is still trash?)

it’s collective pressure/belief

The “scientific” aspect is largely psychiatric.

You should check out the history of USA sometime.