The unfiltered dogshit opinions of a Tylenol enthusiast

  • 0 Posts
  • 37 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: October 2nd, 2025

help-circle


  • It’s nice.

    Tbh I’d pay a premium to join a service that provides game servers and matchmaking with verified adults just to avoid gaming with children.

    I don’t want it forced by the government because that’s just state surveillance but I’d absolutely pay for a washed only gaming service.
















  • To overlap the next shift would have to come in early or the first would stay late.

    So either you make it even harder to come in on time or you permanently institute the issue of running late.

    Not to mention that would absolutely just become another dumbass all Hands-On meeting to waste everyone’s time with.

    Nah people should just be there when they agreed to, being flaky is not and should not be everyone else’s problem.



  • My problem is that these labels don’t differentiate the levels at which demonstrable harm occurs. I’m not against labels, I’m against bad labels

    Putting something that’s harmful at the parts per million(ppm) level in the exact same category as something that’s harmful in the parts per billion(ppb) level is counterproductive.

    This results in people treating incredibly harmful compounds that are dangerous in the ppb range the same as compounds that are dangerous in the ppm or even ppt(thousand) range.

    Including minor and major carcinogens in the same label makes people think they’re safer than they are.

    It’s why prop65 warnings are a joke and ignored by almost all consumers.

    If we’re going to use a single label that doesn’t differentiate the level of harm then we need to save it for the most harmful compounds only.

    Tldr: Without more information on the label putting nitrates in the same category as asbestos or lead is counterproductive via implied false equivalence.