trash
fedilink
35
trash
fedilink
Display Name
link
fedilink
2•urte bat

Firefox doesn’t have per-site process isolation. That info is from the dev of mull.

I’m not sure what info to take from that linked comment, sorry. I didn’t refer to madaidan or grapheneos.

WebRTC is obviously only a problem if you use it. I think I’ve never used WebRTC in an android browser.

@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
mod
link
fedilink
5•
edit-2
urte bat
conversation

The site isolation claims for the past 3 years are made by madaidan, and not u/subzer0carnage on reddit. To debunk your very own claim, let me cite the developer of Mull and DivestOS himself, from reddit, from 3 weeks ago.

http://web.archive.org/web/20220322130653/https://old.reddit.com/r/PrivacyGuides/comments/t2f4mz/question_about_firefox_android_site_isolation/hylvi0o?context=3

“Site Isolation” on its own is nonsense that people need to stop parroting. When it comes to browsers you have per-site PROCESS and DATA isolation. On desktop:

  • Chromium by default has per-site process isolation
  • Chromium by default has no per-site data isolation
  • Firefox by default has per-site process isolation
  • Firefox by default has some per-site data isolation
    • In private browsing mode has strong per-site data isolation On Android:
  • Chromium by default has per-site process isolation
  • Chromium by default has no per-site data isolation
    • Bromite and Mulch enables strong per-site data isolation
  • Firefox has no per-site process isolation or Android isolateProcess usage
    • This is the big issue people usually mean
  • Firefox by default has little per-site data isolation
    • Mull enables strong per-site data isolation Useful sites:
  • https://divestos.org/index.php?page=browsers
  • https://privacytests.org/ Also because it isn’t obvious, Mull and Mulch are my projects.
Display Name
link
fedilink
4•
edit-2
urte bat

Thx for the clarification. Maybe there was just a misunderstanding. I wrote site isolation but meant per-site process isolation in the first comment but added it in the following comment.

Display Name
link
fedilink
1•urte bat

I was actually very inconsistent. I used “site isolation” and “process isolation” in the first comment and “per-site process isolation” in the second comment.

Create a post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

  • 0 users online
  • 23 users / day
  • 109 users / week
  • 157 users / month
  • 324 users / 6 months
  • 14 subscribers
  • 2.02K Posts
  • 9.18K Comments
  • Modlog