get this; Russia’s watchdog is planning on banning twitter in a month (now even closer) if they don’t do anything about their illegal content in their platform. and now their ISPs are throttling twitter’s traffic to make it unusable.

Illegal content I mean, well… Illegal content. just go to the shady part of the internet and you’ll know what I mean. don’t actually do this

" On March 10th, 2021, the wave of new users started rushing into the Russian constellation of the Fediverse. Hundreds of people were displaced by the measures Russian state communication commission (“Roscomnadzor”) has taken against the microblogging website Twitter, after their failure to comply with the order to remove the unspecified “Illegan Material”. Under the sacntions, the Russian Internet service providers must throttle the traffic in order to make the service unusable, and further default on the Twitter’s side will lead to a full and complete blocking of the website on the Russian soil. " source

this was happening because Russia’s media watchdog announced it was launching an “initial slowdown” at the same day. twitter seems like they don’t even care. read the articles below. I don’t really know why they’re doing this, but I’m not complaining.

Twitter’s response; “We are concerned about free speech”

On Wednesday, Russia began throttling Twitter as a way of pressuring the San Francisco-based company to remove over 3,100 posts found to be in violation of Russian law. Specifically, this includes 450 instances of child pornograpy and more than 2500 incitements to underage suicide.

Twitter responded by saying it was “deeply concerned by increased attempts to block and throttle online public”

I can’t tell whether that’s a joke or not. they can’t be serious. what are they protecting really? I’m baffled here. that wasn’t really a smart move now is it. you have to read this;

Censorship-happy Twitter suddenly concerned about ‘public conversation’ as Russia cracks down on illegal content

Russia Blasts Twitter For Being “Too Slow” In Deleting Content “Harmful For Children”

mind you they were deleting those illegal content. but really, really, really, slowly. source It’s kind of a bit shady from twitter here. It’s only about 3,000 post requested to be removed. but why can’t they just remove it? It’s very questionable as far as this action speaks. why are they protecting those **** and **** posts. there is no reason to do this.

sources;

spoiler

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/517771-twitter-censorship-russia-illegal-content/

https://mastodon.online/web/statuses/105924846376829882

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/russia-threatens-block-twitter-month-76488991

https://tass.com/economy/1269283

https://news.yahoo.com/russia-chides-twitter-slow-deletion-114842231.html?

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/russia-blasts-twitter-being-too-slow-deleting-content-harmful-children

.

that’s it for today. this is really getting to me, I mean. It’s really funny though. the only thing I learn from diving into this rabbit hole is Twitter is really dumb. and yeah… have a great day everyone.

  • @dragonX@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    To be real mastodon or any other federated network will be easier to shut down than Twitter or Facebook. giant social media platforms benefit from their network effect. if blocked they will cause major problems to Russia ,and will further tarnish its image globally.

    • @Gwynne@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      legally speaking, you don’t have a reason to shut down servers that doesn’t do it, only the servers that has illegal content.

      Fediverse platforms like mastodon already has a list of blacklisted servers, if they want to shut us down, they don’t have much reason to do so, because unlike twitter, mastodon can just tell the Russian watchdogs to block certain instances from a list. and the russians could run instances on their own with their own rules. (i.e. rules that complies with russian law. also russian laws aren’t that different from US when it comes to prohibited content)

      if the russians realize not one geopolitical entity has control over it, the one who controls it are just different people from around the world. why would they ever do such thing?

      • @k_o_t@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        63 years ago

        the lawfulness of content is not the issue here, they don’t care really, only using it as a somewhat legitimate excuse to shut down platforms that are used by their political opponents

        you can set up a mastodon instance with the strictest moderation possible checking every post against every law, but if you get significant traction with political opposition, you will get noticed and they will try to shut you down, regardless of legality of content there

        they can always just appeal to one of the many very broad laws regarding content on the internet, or if for whatever reason that doesn’t work just pass a brand new law specifically for that, as they control the majority in the state duma (a law making organ)

        • @Gwynne@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          not in the case of twitter though, they’ve been asking to remove those 3,000 (2,862) posts since 2017, just now they’re finally taking action. I don’t think russia is doing as bad as anyone else say they are.

          • @k_o_t@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            banning illegal content and getting rid of undesirable platforms is an intertwined effort for them

            i’m not saying that twitter is innocent of course here, but giving the benefit of doubt to roskomnadzor and the russian government in general is the last thing i would do, especially given their track record regarding internet censorship…

            • @Gwynne@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              43 years ago

              if anything I hope, they won’t do anything as stupid as making mastodon illegal because some instances has ‘illegal content’. we can celebrate this one for now.

        • @Gwynne@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          using it as a somewhat legitimate excuse to shut down platforms that are used by their political opponents

          they don’t have that excuse this time around, no one owns the fediverse.

      • @dragonX@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Well (illegal content) could be defined differently by different governments.

        • (LGBTQ ++++) is specifically in Russia illegal content.
        • criticism of the state is illegal content.
        • protest organizing is illegal content
        • Blasphemy is in many regions illegal content.
        • and many more
          IMO hammering twitter to delete C.P (that could even be planted by russian fake accounts) is just the beginning and not the end goal.
    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
      link
      fedilink
      83 years ago

      There are trade offs, platforms like Mastodon are federated and that means you end up playing wack-a-mole with them. Running a server is pretty easy, and people can just spin up instances and build communities with their friends there. If one instance gets shut down that doesn’t kill the whole network.

      • @AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        platforms like Mastodon are federated and that means you end up playing wack-a-mole with them

        Each federated platform has a fingerprint though, like opening up API channels with the same names. It would be pretty easy to just block any server that has the fingerprints of a federated platform you don’t want in your country.

        • ufra
          link
          fedilink
          33 years ago

          that’s a keen insight I hadn’t thought of, but with https it seems it would be a lot harder to dragnet and require probing the actual instances, no?

          • @AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            43 years ago

            but with https it seems it would be a lot harder to dragnet and require probing the actual instances

            Yes, but just as federated instances can discover each other through existing federation connections, they can also do that if they wanted to blanked ban a platform.

            • ufra
              link
              fedilink
              33 years ago

              definitely, just a bit more expensive. it would be funny to see a CV of an agent listing ActivityPub Special Task Force on it, but surely its out there in some form.

              this seems like one more good reason to get robots enhancement in https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/707

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
              link
              fedilink
              43 years ago

              Not really because you have to do it on case by case basis. It’s just an HTTP server, so unless you go banning HTTP entirely, you have to play whack-a-mole.

            • @Gwynne@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              33 years ago

              they would have no reason to ban a worldwide-and-fair social media platform. the reason they’re banning twitter is because the one controlling that platform is the US. I doubt they care that much about removing **** than they care about removing control from other geopolitical entities.

      • @dragonX@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        33 years ago

        If the state of things have though me anything. is that people don’t care about it being federated. if they block fediverse instances people won’t be so keen to keep hoping from one another. don’t forget that not only it is veryhard to buildup large online communities, but once those online connections (social graph) are broken. it will be very hard for them to be revived.
        With the fediverse at the moment having very little traction, I bet government bans will be a deadly blow to the fediverse. people will go back to whatever central coercive solution is provided.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
          link
          fedilink
          53 years ago

          I don’t think communities need to be large. I find that most meaningful interactions actually happen in small communities focused on particular interests. I think that people setting up servers and running small communities of hundreds or thousands of users results in much more interesting networks than giant platforms like Fb or Twitter.

          • @Gwynne@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            33 years ago

            That’s really true. the content in twitter. youtube, instagram etc. are too focused on celebrities and politics. too much scrolling on things that don’t matter that much as it has nothing to do with us. Social medias are supposed to be used to connect with people. if simping on celebrities everyday is your thing. well, I kind of find it detrimental to your well being. socialize with real people and go about your day chasing your dreams, surround yourself with people that are productive.