trash
fedilink

I respectfully disagree.

Lemmy users should have been allowed to choose seeing content from other link aggregators like Reddit, Hacker News, etc.

I do not assume to talk on behalf of the developer, but I would think that that is not the point of Lemmy. Lemmy is supposed to be a link aggregator-slash-discussion platform that is not owned by a corporate entity.

Again, I may be wrong. Please feel free to correct me.

LibReddit users should have been allowed to participate instead of just reading.

That would entirely undo the privacy features of libreddit. AFAIK it was a deliberate decision to disable logins. If you still have the urge to respond in a thread, there is a direct link to the discussion on the Reddit site.

Which is why I think that Lemmy and LibReddit should have been the same project. Instead users who don’t want to compromise have to use both.

Since both Lemmy and Reddit have publicly available APIs, you could consider rolling your own aggregator. I agree with @victorvelsol@lemmy.ml that managing the accounts would pose some challenges.

@victorvelsol@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
7
edit-2
7 hilabete

deleted by creator

@Akimoto@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
57 hilabete

Agreed, having discussion is what makes reddit and lemmy unique. Libreddit, while the interface is clean, is more like a reddit-powered rss feed.

@OptimusPrime@lemmy.ml
creator
link
fedilink
0
edit-2
7 hilabete

deleted by creator

@victorvelsol@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
3
edit-2
7 hilabete

deleted by creator

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

  • 0 users online
  • 10 users / day
  • 33 users / week
  • 42 users / month
  • 168 users / 6 months
  • 4 subscribers
  • 403 Posts
  • 3.02K Comments
  • Modlog