• 3 Posts
  • 4.06K Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月18日

help-circle


  • But Beijing, including Chinese leader Xi Jinping himself, has also spoken about the risks posed by AI. China must “balance development and security”, and introduce and improve relevant laws and ethical guidelines, and strengthen prevention of risks, to “safeguard the interests of the people and national security”, state security minister Chen Yixin wrote on Sunday.

    This is true I’ve read articles about how the Chinese government is working on legal models to make AI “safe for children”.

    It’s ironic in these times of asymmetric warfare beating traditional war machinery at a fraction of the price.
    It’s kind of the same the Chinese is doing on AI. USA is building huge datacenters concentrated around the forecasts for less than a handful of AI companies. While China is building AI into everything, and are working on making AI work decentralized to be useful in way more task specific circumstances and way cheaper.

    Maybe the 2 can coexist? But I think the American approach is overkill, and a lot of people will lose a lot of money they invested in that shit.

    So I don’t think the competition from China is designed to be malicious or disruptive, it has grown out from a different set of circumstances and necessity, because USA has been denying China the necessary chips to perform well with the American approach. Making it near impossible for China to work with American companies especially suppliers. Which China did until American politicians ruined it.

    China is building AI for everybody to use everywhere. While USA is attempting to monopolize AI services within monolithic services controlled by a few gigantic companies.

    I think safety is also easier to implement with the Chinese model, that doesn’t attempt to create AGI or Strong AI as we used to call it. But is creating AI that works well for what it was designed for.




  • Having the fan blow out will mostly repeatedly replace the air close by the window, as the air sucked by the fan is taken from the immediate surroundings, and that air is standing mostly still, so the same pocket of air will continuously be replaced.
    If you let the fan blow into the room however, it will be pushed further into the room, helping to move the air in the room more, and increasing how much air is actually shifted out of the room.
    The problem with taking in the air it blows from the immediate vicinity still exist, but normally there will be some movement in outside air, so the air sucked from the immediate vicinity is replaced by the natural wind replacing it outside, preventing the air that just escaped the room from being sucked in again.

    So blowing in replaces way more air on average, the exception being if it works against an airflow in the room in opposite direction.