Crappfully yours,

Dual_sport_dork

Me? I’m not going to. I don’t have influence or power. But I will support those that do, and my tiny amount of support makes it easier, rather than accepting that nothing can change.

So disqualify the countries with influence. Not as simple. Still fair.

Ok? This is likely true. What is your point? It is not easy or convenient. But easy and convenient do not make right or wrong, moral or immoral, legal or illegal.

Should have added “no mistakes, no bugs” to the prompt! Pffft, amateur.

This argument is ludicrous. Something either is or is not moral, and is or is not illegal. Being caught and convicted doesn’t change that. It was illegal. It was immoral. It should be investigated. Countries that commit warcrimes should be sanctioned, and countries with influence should not be above the law.

Ok? I…I agreed there should be? I’m not sure what your point here is?

By whom?

Simpler, sure. Morally incorrect. America should be investigated for attacking those ships, and if it was found to be a warcrime, they should be held to task.

Global consensus would be best. A united league of nations to discuss it would work otherwise. But, barring all of that, I’ll use my own judgement. Isreal has committed warcrimes. Russia has committed warcrimes. I’m ok with them being shunned from global sports and entertainment. And, if it is determined that my country is actively committing warcrimes, then we should be shunned too.

That isn’t equivalent because Ukraine did not commit warcrimes. Why shouldn’t a country committing warcrimes be blocked?

I assumed so, but I like to put up a defense sometimes, because otherwise people only see their nonsensical points.

Why not? Why allow a country committing war crimes to participate on the global sports or entertainment stage like everything is normal?

Yooooo, I loved this game! First autobattler, I think. Something minions?

That’s sound logic, and I appreciate you clarifying your tone. My apologies if I reacted too strongly! However, I would ask if there is a case of AI hate against some media that does not have poor quality AI slop in it? Not including unreleased products. My position is that I am anti-AI for 2 reasons. It is soulless and low quality. The soulless thing, sure, is ideology. But I’ve yet to see an example of AI art use that didn’t have some inhuman flaw.

I completely agree. We have had placeholder art since the 80s, and never needed AI for it. They are seeing what gets past us so they don’t need to replace it.

But it is related. Because they keep using AI and it keeps turning into low quality shit. Toy Story took effort and imagination and skill to animate, and at the end, it looked incredible. When I was a kid and Toy Story came out, I wasn’t looking at it and saying “how lazy these animators are to not draw this” I was saying “I’ve never seen anything like this before!”. They took the tools they invented and played into its strengths. It made plasticy lifeless unreal looking humans, so they made the main characters toys. Toy Story is actually the perfect counter example to this AI bullshit, because it was obviously made with skill and love, and AI use keeps showing us it is a lazy shortcut to shitty work.

When poor quality work gets into the game? Yeah. I’d rather just not buy new games if they’re gonna give me slop like this. If they don’t have the decency to care about the quality of their work, why should I?

Basically just close up the loopholes and get rid of tax havens. Make it so that the rich can’t remove their money from the economy. I think businesses should also pay more in tax as opposed to individuals.

Only if that’s how the system is set up. Tax everything sold by a certain percent. Tax businesses on their stock value. Tax income and net wealth over a certain amount. There are ways to enable taxes that protect the poor. But, to be fair, I am heavily in favor of a strong social security net. I want the weak, poor and unhealthy to know where they will be sleeping tonight and eating tomorrow.