

Is it really “safety of the tank” or is it that they’d rather a faster fire rate at the expense of a possible cook off?


Is it really “safety of the tank” or is it that they’d rather a faster fire rate at the expense of a possible cook off?
Honestly, it’s a step up from “food is optional as long as I’m not heavily nauseous” so any advice is welcome to me at this point
Bonus points if you’re unfortunately Albertan 🙃 🔫
Plz just nuke us


Based Poland


Inglorious bastards and the bear jew.


Nato will exist long after Russia has crumbled 😘


Imo and tbh basically mean the same thing tbh and imo you didn’t need to use both


Most people don’t believe me when I say the Fax machine was invented in 1843… And no that’s not a typo


Moved from US to Canada back in high school long ago…
Holy shit meat quality was NIGHT AND DAY. I’d never go back


Fuck kinda pricey bud. Where abouts?
I’m the reason we get a safety meeting today, if that counts? 😊


How I look paying off my neighbors debts



Fuck no. He’s the premier of Ontario
Mark Carney is the new PM


Sweet. Now you got 7 months at most to make enough of a difference for people to keep you in power. Otherwise it’s maple maga millhouse


I absolutely fucking hate that I can’t say you’re being a bit overkill.
What the actual fuck


Here you go 


He’s not ‘jedi mind tricking’ you. He’s correcting you moving the goal post to suit your argument.
You stated they had plans. A political threat and drafting invasion plans are two VASTLY different things.


Yes any state sponsored assainations of private citizens (especially indirectly associated citizens) should be protested. Including the US’sactions… But that’s not what we’re here to talk about now is it?
Also, completely valid to draft plans to invade anyone. Acting on those plans are where the line is crossed.


Comparing strategic war plans to state sponsored assainations of private citizens…
Gold medal in mental gymnastics
I miss the IBM mouse clitoris of the 90s