Huh, I had no idea that tractors etc. were also facing this no-self-repair crap. Always though them to be something like the gold standard of repairability… but apparently it was just the old ones.
This would be useful! I never remember the correct URL format for subscribeable community. And for non-techy people the task of finding it can be downright impossible.
Isn’t this to be expected sooner or later anyway? There are only so many useful discoveries to be made, though I’m not saying that the present decline is because of this limit.
Probably it wouldn’t be too hard to piece together an aggregate view of several (likeminded) communities. But obviously you couldn’t post into this view directly.
but to use it as a “real” license would mean you hope one day to use it in the statist legal system and i really question the legitimacy it would have there.
This is also a major point. Why beta-test an untested license, when there are plenty of solid licenses to choose from?
I’m no fan of capitalism, but to me open-source is more important than keeping capitalists away. AGPL would have been the correct choice of license IMO. It’s also pretty effective at repelling corporations.
Huh, I had no idea that tractors etc. were also facing this no-self-repair crap. Always though them to be something like the gold standard of repairability… but apparently it was just the old ones.