I like to aimlessly walk around and see where I land.
I like to aimlessly walk around and see where I land.
But people started using it for small groups, for some reason. They had somehow amazing PR.
The question was about irreversible consequences, not the best way to get into drug use. The later you start, the more stable you brain is - the less consequential it will be for your development. Not hating on drugs by the way, drugs are awesome. But they do mess with your brain.
Zoom was used a lot for small groups. Maybe for 500 - 1000 there is not much - not my user case. But people started to use it for small group meetings, and the the audio quality (in the sense how it manages multiple people talking) was always better with other software.
The later you start doing drugs the better.
Skype, hangouts, discord.
How zoom managed to become a thing, while alternatives already existed and were rather well known is beyond me.
Have you read some low quality journalism? The whole yellow press can be replaced with GTP and no one would ever see a difference.
Bad writing is still a step above rng junk, imo.
I’v read writing worse than GTP. I had to help someone write an essay - and I just wrote it for him in the end, because he absolutely lacked the skills to write a long meaningful text. At at the same time - genius of a percussionist.
Even medium human writers can comprehend their work as a whole, though
Sure, but a lot of humans are rather bad writers.
but any company going full LLM isn’t looking for quality.
That is true for 24h news cycle of online media, regardless LLM.
The thing is, the LLM doesn’t actually know anything, and lies about it.
Just like your average human journalist. If you ever read an article from not specialist journal on a topic you are familiar with - you know. This seems actually where LLM are very similar to how human brain works - if we don’t know something, we come up with some bullshit.
Seems to be an extremely inefficient resource distribution system, where a few people end up with most resources while a shit ton of people lack basic needs stuff. There are some good existing work arounds, like social market economy - which tries to combine socialist and capitalist element in an unholily dialectic alliance.
No if you deliver on your lie, or are good enough in creating an appearance of delivering on your lie.
Not technical, but always interested in technical advances.
A good Berserk adaptation.
You cannot be convicted for an action that was made illegal after you comitted it.
That was not my point. The point is, if the tech for mass surveillance is already in place and the laws change to more authoritarian or even just more dumb, it will be harder to escape those.
“I have nothing to gain from sharing my life with them”.
That is obvious not true, otherwise people would not be using social media.
If you have nothing to hide… but then they just change the laws, now you are a criminal and they already have handy tools in place to convict you.
I’m an reddit addict so it takes some time, but I’m working on it. It helps that reddit quality dropped and I’v been banned in one of four subs I was interested in.
I kind of just assume everything on the internet is in public space by default.
Just that children are dying because of spiral of hatered and violance, promoted by populism. But its obviously up to everyone if they want to participate.