It would not be that hard. There just needs to be a way to federate the change.

1. Authenticate the new account. This could be as simple as an account admin code that is only available when logged in, or authenticated through the old server.

2. Scrape the old account for links and backlinks. Federate changes so that they link to the new account.

3. You might need a workaround for mentions and follows. Those would be spread across other users’ accounts, so probably not fixable.

4. Copy any content that was not already federated to the new host.

If devs wanted to, they would. They don’t want to. I guess you could ask them why.

No, it’s still creepy and dumb

I have a really dumb question, but what is a gem?

You’re forgetting Threads and Truth Social. I wish I could forgot them too, so no judgement.

https://lemvotes.org/

I agree but how does RCS actually work? My understanding is that it is particularly difficult to implement.

Open-source is a stretch. Open weights are more like blobs. They run and can be used openly, but it’s not as though you can build it yourself. No way to know how it was trained or if the training was manipulated by various interests.

Yes.

Pay up or sell it as condos.

Butterfly map? No? Don’t care.

To hold the landlord personally responsible for the homes they own.

Consider somebody who escaped generational poverty through athletics, film, etc. One of the smartest ways for somebody without a wealthy support system to end the cycle of generational poverty is to own property. Now, say that the sports star or a film star wants to by a secondary house for a friend, a teacher, a family member who helped along the way to expand that cycle of breaking generational poverty. Or maybe they want to purchase their childhood home. Whatever the reason may be, they are now being penalized for helping others.

Well, usually commercial buildings are separate from residential.

But yes, I see the problem with the first example.

Some people have suggested that it starts after the second house, which I would be on board with. But also, it starts lower for one home. Two homes is significantly more, but still low. as the number goes up, the percentage goes up until it becomes untenable to buy massive housing stock for rental or investment.

That’s exactly how it works in a lot of places.

The UK has a sales tax like that on home purchases. The problem is that it prevents people from selling houses when their kids move out. It’s too expensive to sell the house and buy a new one, so you have a lot of older couples living in five bedroom houses that are empty.

How would that work for apartment buildings or 4-plexes?

There are major tax breaks in at least the US for your first home. Yet companies don’t already do this because it would be fraud. Too risky. If the expense of getting caught is high enough, then companies don’t tend to break the law.

Make it a felony. Send an executive or two to jail. See how that shifts the behavior.

This is essentially a square increase. If one home is one dollar, two home would total $4, three homes would total $9, etc.

Oh, I like that a lot.