• 44 Posts
  • 59 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle



  • There’s no criticism of the outside factors

    The article literally starts with “In 2026, the job market is tough. AI plunged us all into economic despair” (itself exaggerated, and a play on the typical “AI doomer” clickbait articles saying what we all know more dramatically, which is another can of worms).

    It shouldn’t be a sentence for poverty.

    Agreed. And in the article it isn’t. He does get a job at the end.

    But yeah, I can see how your reading of the article is valid. I’ll sleep on it and see if I can do something about it.


  • I don’t actually think I frame that as the only alternative. There’s nuance on the article. It’s a bit up to you how to interpret it. Some options are:

    • He would have actually kept the job if he hadn’t slacked off the final week, and kept using AI.
    • The job was not a good fit for him anyway because the vibecode-heavy workspace virtually required using AI. But that doesn’t meant that there wouldn’t be other jobs for him (he gets one at the end btw).
    • He might have been able to get by without AI if he didn’t go through his gargantuan vimwiki project for 3 weeks.

  • I don’t imply that being able to use AI tools is a panacea to get a job. I don’t imply that the reason for many lay offs isn’t related to AI.

    I don’t insinuate that being out of work is entirely the fault of the worker. I’m just making the nuanced point that some workers can sometimes do more beneficial things when looking for work, without realizing that that’s the case. This can happen despite the main barrier to getting a job being a completely external cause (as it’s indeed implied in the article).

    I understand that the topic is uncomfortable. That’s why I tried to to put it in the context of humor and satire. Basically I’m asking what can we do better when trying to get a job, even if an external, uncontrollable situation would make any improvement almost pointless.
















  • Great question! Yes, Backbone appears twice.

    First, it’s artistic license. I think the Backbone.js school is the “backbone” of our current front-end era, for better or worse. So, it fits that the backbone of the hyper-cubical cross is represented by Backbone.js (twice). Spoiler alert: The cover art’s meaning becomes clear around the halfway point on the book, if you’re curious.

    Second: Yeah, that was a “happy accident” by genAI. To be fair the first $50 that gets donated for this book on my Kofi link go directly to commission a real artist for a cover remake.