How many real teachers per student though? Is this just an excuse to have even less human support, because “we have 10 AIs per student”?
What does a ratio even mean in this case, the AIs are not separate.
How many real teachers per student though? Is this just an excuse to have even less human support, because “we have 10 AIs per student”?
What does a ratio even mean in this case, the AIs are not separate.
It’s called “bcachefs”
Great, post an unactionable critique in a foreign language, that will make the overworked devs feel better.
This is a joke right?
A good thing about Google Domains is that they support SRS for email forwarding, it’s a pain to find providers that do this correctly…
This is like saying someone uploaded malware to Github, therefore Open Source Software is insecure.
It would be like that if someone had put made-up information on a talk page or their user page. Information in the main namespace is supposed to be patrolled and checked for references, which is the point of the article. Your analogy is dishonest.
[edit: double-posted somehow, sorry]
deleted by creator
I think it would benefit from specific communities or content creators adopting it. As long as it’s only general topics (technology, Linux, …) it has basically the same info as Reddit/Hackernews/… but less up to date and less commented. It is useless if you already use those other platforms and probably can’t get ahead this way.
I could see Godot/Blender/… adopt it though. Blender already uses PeerTube. That would help kickstart this place.
The software is great but the people aren’t there.
An alias only runs a single command
Link to where “WebDev working standards” say URLs should be short? SEO benefits from more info in URL, and so does web browser history/bookmark search. Many platforms such as Reddit and Medium put the title (or part of it) in the URL.
Presenting your opinions as fact and quoting “standards and teaching” when asked does not advance the debate.
Should be the default why? Is recommended by who?
A system of groups that have their own rules is not anarchy, no. If it was, the world itself (system of countries) would be anarchy by your own definition.
You can open it, delete it, then finish reading it. The file will disappear from its folder but of course the data won’t actually be deleted until you close it.
Like this, with bash job control:
cat file.txt & rm file txt; fg
Or this, with shell file descriptors:
exec 3< file.txt; rm file.txt; cat <&3; exec 3<&-
Those libraries “inside the app package” would still be versions picked by the distro, and would still “inevitably take longer to get security fixes than upstream” as you put it. In addition it would take more disk space by having multiple copies.
Is there a single benefit to this?
I don’t understand your recommendation. How could the distro package apps if they don’t package the libraries they depend on?
Does Apple refund your device if they pull the apps you were using from their store? I have nothing against vendors changing their mind, so long as I get what I paid for.
Does it have any instructions on deployment? Or is only their hosted version released in beta?
I think it’s safe to say that GitHub went above and beyond what is required. They prevented people from getting their own data before blocking them permanently from the site, which they did without warning, and apparently even targeted people who weren’t in those countries at all but merely had connected from one in the past. They could definitely do better.
There’s focalboard (if you can get past the weird license): https://www.focalboard.com/
Or you can use Gitea: https://gitea.io/ It’s mostly meant for collaboration on source code but it has a ticketing system with boards.