• nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    it isn’t propaganda.

    it’s been a while since I’ve used windows, but I remember having to give administrator privileges to software installers, whether they are from legitimate vendors or from ripping groups with modified code

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thats a windows thing so it can put files in “protected” folders like program files

        • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Some software installers still ask if I want to install for all users, which require elevated permissions, or only for me, which don’t. In that last option it will not prompt for elevated permissions as it will use one of my user’s folders which I have already all permissions for, obviously.

          It’s a security measure that’s half assed. People are so used to it they just click allow but don’t actually look at the prompt anymore. Like I see a lot of people do with cookies on websites.

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Thats a windows thing so it can put files in “protected” folders like program files

            The unfortunate thing about the UAC prompt is that it gives the software permission to put files in protected folders, but it also gives the software root permission so it can do literally anything else without prompting the user. Except, I believe, if it tries to install unsigned kernel drivers, then the user has to click a new prompt… but you can completely compromise a machine with the permissions that users routinely give to executables that they download from the Internet.