EDITED TO MAKE THE TITLE MORE APPROPRIATE. The previous title of this post was “I need to tell you something unsatisfying: your personal consumption choices will not make a meaningful difference to the amount of enshittification you experience in your life” which was the slug line as it appeared in my mailing-list-to-RSS reader. Although this is the first paragraph of the linked essay, it does not do a good job of explaining the thrust of the essay, and some people (not you though) seem to be arguing with the title instead of the essay.

(Thanks to ski11erboi@lemmy.world for the heads up.)

END OF EDITED SECTION

Here’s why you’re getting enshittified: we deliberately decided to stop enforcing competition laws. As a result, companies formed monopolies and cartels. This means that they don’t have to worry about losing your business or labor to a competitor, because they don’t compete. It also means that they can handily capture their regulators, because they can easily agree on a set of policy priorities and use the billions they’ve amassed by not competing to capture their regulators. They can hold a whip hand over their formerly powerful tech workers, mass-firing them and terrorizing them out of any Tron-inspired conceits about “fighting for the user.” Finally, they can use IP law to shut down anyone who makes technology that disenshittifies their offerings.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 个月前

    I don’t care.

    I avoid the services as a protest and I also enjoy the alternatives.

    I’m not going to bankrupt them, but I’m not helping them.

    • Sundray@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 个月前

      I’m not going to bankrupt them, but I’m not helping them.

      That’s good!

      If you ever want to step up to hurting them, you’ll probably need to party up.