Like, would a skyscraper-style datacenter be practical? Or is just a matter of big, flat buildings being cheaper?

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah that’s the only difference. Usually land is cheaper. But building high in the middle of nowhere is only like 5% more expensive.

        • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          That’s complete bullshit. Building one floor on cheap land is way, way cheaper than building high on expensive land.

          source: Wyoming.

          and of course, building one floor of data center is exponentially cheaper than building two floors.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s also not the core purpose of the data center. The building is a shell protecting racks of servers, the core purpose of a data center. Why spend anymore than absolutely necessary when it would not increase the output of that core purpose.