• Nibodhika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    No, they couldn’t, have you read about the PS3? They were a lot cheaper than building a similar system so several companies bought thousands to build clusters, I personally worked at a relatively small university that had a cluster made of dozens of PS3s, since each Playstation costed Sony around $200 my university on its own costed thousands to Sony, and I imagine every other university and some private companies did the same.

      • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Only after they closed their system, which they did because they were losing money to every single enterprise in the world who wanted a cluster and PS3 were the cheapest option.

        • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The PS3 was using a rare CPU that you could only get from it or from some enterprise dealer at a much higher price. The Steam Machine is a standard x86 computer that can’t match the ubiquitous ThinkCentres in price/performance.

          • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            If it’s sold at a loss like a console it would beat the price/performance of any other x86 chip on the market, which is why they can’t sell it at a loss, ergo my point.