He could also just be a very literal person, perhaps autistic or uninformed, using terms exactly as they are defined, who wants to support equality but not support philogyny. Either way, clarifying that the feminism is humanism and equality and hardlining that point is the answer.
He could also just be a very literal person, perhaps autistic or uninformed, using terms exactly as they are defined, who wants to support equality but not support philogyny. Either way, clarifying that the feminism is humanism and equality and hardlining that point is the answer.
Fair enough