- cross-posted to:
- linux@lemmy.ml
- linux@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
Do not attribute to stupidity actions that can be adequately explained by greed.
As some of the article’s comments say, the answer is probably the simplest: IBM.
IBM said they’d let Red Hat operate independently, but it was a matter of time before some of that corporate “culture” (aka stock-driven decisions) started showing through.
Hopefully the employees themselves aren’t slowly sinking into the IBM workload. I think a lot of them intentionally left IBM for Red Hat specifically because of the ideological difference.
IBM wants to userp Canonical as the Windows of Linux.
IBM are useless. They had a decade head start on LLM with Watson but still couldn’t make it profitable.