• dsmk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, tl;dr: After being hammered by strikes they made an offer to hand him over to a 3rd party?

      • grte@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s correct. It wasn’t their first attempt, either. Instead Bush opted for the 20 years of occupation for whatever reason.

        • dsmk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not defending the occupation and whole “nation building” (which I doubt they though would take 20 years). Just pointing out that there was a difference between Afghanistan and Iraq, and that difference was reflected by the support (or lack of) from other countries.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The United States today rejected yet another offer by Afghanistan’s ruling Taliban to turn over Osama bin Laden for trial in a third country if the U.S. presents evidence against bin Laden and stops air attacks.

      It’s insane to suggest the US would ever agree to that.

      I believe it would have been the correct move, but the US as a nation would straight up never agree to that. The citizenry would have lost their fucking minds.