thehatfox@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoMicrosoft’s Activision Blizzard deal gets preliminary approval from UK regulatorwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1147arrow-down15
arrow-up1142arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft’s Activision Blizzard deal gets preliminary approval from UK regulatorwww.theverge.comthehatfox@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareKalash@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoDoesn’t matter. The option to pay for some more content is literally what I’m hopeing for.
minus-squaretryptaminev@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoyes it does matter. These are businesses. They make money by selling things. You cannot compare one rereleasing the same game with minimal changes for new money to keep supporting an existing game without charging new money.
minus-squareKalash@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIt doesn’t to me. They can re-release the game with an updated engine or just add more content via DLCs and expansions, I’ll take either.
minus-squaretryptaminev@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoand thats fine, but doesnt make it possible to compare apples and oranges.
Doesn’t matter. The option to pay for some more content is literally what I’m hopeing for.
yes it does matter. These are businesses. They make money by selling things. You cannot compare one rereleasing the same game with minimal changes for new money to keep supporting an existing game without charging new money.
It doesn’t to me. They can re-release the game with an updated engine or just add more content via DLCs and expansions, I’ll take either.
and thats fine, but doesnt make it possible to compare apples and oranges.