Maybe a naive question, but Is there a service like 23 and me but that doesn’t collect/keep my genetic information ? @nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

  • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s absolutely abusive that in order to get your genetic background you have to be willing for the government to have your DNA.

    • kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not even gouvernement, it’s other companies. One day some insurance company will decide to pull out your protections because, turns out, you have X% chances to get a cancer by your 40. Then all other insurance companies do the same. Then, one of them accepts you, but you gotta pay N% more for the same coverage

    • Sparky678348@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What are the potential downsides of the government having your DNA? I don’t think I can think of any for real

      I mean other than getting in the fingerprint registry if you’re trying to commit a crime I guess

      • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re absolutely right, I can’t think of a single point in history where there was mass persecution of any particular group by a government which might have been far more efficient of they had a handy database of every citizens DNA. Just never happens, not once in all of history. There’s definitely no shining example less than a century ago.

      • abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        What if the government in the nearby future decides it is illegal to watch porn? They trace your ip to your house, come with a search warrant, find you cumsock or vibrator covered in dna and you’re in the system. Boink! Off to horny jail with you!

      • kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Copy pasting my other comment

        One day some insurance company will decide to pull out your protections because, turns out, you have X% chances to get a cancer by your 40. Then all other insurance companies do the same. Then, one of them accepts you, but you gotta pay N% more for the same coverage

      • XbSuper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Both of the responses to your comment are batshit lol.

        I don’t like the idea of the government having my dna, but does anyone have a genuine (non irrational) reason it would be bad?

        • kaiomai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The cumsock comment was batty, yes, but the other is absolutely on point. You are delusional if you think this can’t go wrong.

        • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Capitalism won’t let anything about you be yours if it can be avoided and the government works for the corporations. With enough money and government interference anything is possible and it is utterly naive to think otherwise.

        • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The US alone has a rich history of repression (Wikipedia even has a sub-subcategory specifically for ethnic cleansing) and it’s common knowledge those DNA databases have been used by US police to track people down so it’s really not difficult to link those two concepts. These are concrete examples of things the US government does or has done, not some hypothetical scenario.

          And that’s all assuming the data is only accessible to governments that have to pretend to care about their citizens, not the for-profit companies and malicious actors that currently do have access to that data.