• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The problem is hosting (storage, network) is expensive.

    IIRC some platforms (feddit.org, catbox.moe) pays $1000 per month, and that’s mostly just static images.

    Videos is much more than that. Who pays for that?

    • 0x0@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I have a hunch Linus at LTT could float his own storage for whatever stuff he wants to host. The same way you and me have to pay for our own online storage.

      • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Hosting is only half the equation you have to be able to serve it people all around the world at once with no buffering. People have no clue how amazing YouTube is for a free service. Bandwidth costs a fuckload of money too to add to the hosting cost.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          PopcornTime might be a good model for a decentralized YouTube system. You could pick a movie and then it would find a torrent and start downloading it.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah, that would mean everybody pays for hosting videos themselves. The question is: is that a viable strategy / are users willing to put up with that.