• demunted@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I know it doesn’t have the efficiency of an m4 but…

      https://www.amazon.com/Beelink-Computer-5600MHz-PCIe4-0-Thunderbolt/dp/B0D9GDQXKG

      Here's a more detailed comparison:
      
      Intel Core Ultra 9 185H:
      Pros:
      
      Higher RAM speed (7467 MHz) and larger maximum memory (96 GB). 
      More CPU threads (22) and supports multithreading. 
      Supports more displays (4). 
      
      Cons:
      
      Higher power consumption compared to the M4. 
      Higher price point compared to the M4 Mac Mini. 
      
      Apple M4 (8-core CPU) in the M4 Mac Mini:
      Pros:
      Exceptional performance per watt (power efficiency). 
      Lower price point and better value for the performance. 
      Cons:
      Lower RAM speed (6400 MHz) and smaller maximum memory (24 GB) compared to the Ultra 9 185H. 
      Fewer CPU threads (8). 
      Supports fewer displays (2). 
      
      
      In summary: 
      If you prioritize raw power, multi-threaded performance, and memory capacity, the Ultra 9 185H is the better choice. 
      
      However, if you prioritize power efficiency, budget, and value for the money, the M4 Mac Mini is the more appealing option. 
        • demunted@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Agreed.i really want a powerful non dgpu high efficiency unit. The amd current gen don’t cut it and always pair with horrific bad wifi on laptops. Maybe Strix point?

        • demunted@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Each to their own. Yes I am aware of what I posted. They (apple) make excellent hardware. I choose products that live on for years, not at the mercy of a closed environment. I want to do what I want with my hardware. We have different needs and I respect your choices.