BaldProphet

By that logic, the Fediverse is already irrelevant, because it has fewer features and fewer users than major corporate social media platforms.

Thank heavens for Incus.

The Fediverse isn’t owned by a single entity, so it can’t be simply bought out.

Oh, believe me, I do listen, and I learn about things that I use on a regular basis. Based on my understanding of the ActivityPub protocol, I sincerely believe that concerns about Threads are exaggerated. It’s very cult-like, with talk of “pacts” and tendencies towards prophecy and a “purity” mentality.

So much fear mongering.

Reminds me of Bait.

I don’t want my software pushing propaganda on me. Thanks but no thanks.

Build quality on Frameworks is dramatically better than most ThinkPads. They’ve made a lot of improvements to battery life since the first generation (I got mine in the second batch), so it might have decent battery life now. They’ve always been more efficient on Linux than on Windows.

Will humanity even exist then?

I’ve made no definitive statements, only conjecture. I’m really not sure what argument you’re trying to make.

I’m not shitting on anyone, I’m simply stating facts. It is a possible explanation for the idiotic moves the Iranian military has been making as of late: Lack of experience.

More than half of Iran is too young to remember Operation Praying Mantis, or wasn’t even born yet. They may underestimate America’s willingness to respond forcefully to acts of aggression against us.

1. Israel didn’t kick the Arabs out, Britain did.

2. Jews are the original inhabitants of the Land of Israel. A more correct analogy would be a bunch of Aztecs walking into Mexico City, being granted a small part of it by Mexico, and then Mexico forcibly evicting all non-Aztecs from that area.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

The bias is evident in the article. It heavily implies that the strike must have been the IDF without outright stating as much. That’s what bias is, a slant in a particular angle.

You are outright lying. In the first few paragraphs of Hamas’ founding document, it clearly calls for the “obliteration” of the state of Israel. It’s about genocide against Israel, not “Palestinian lives and rights”.

Yes. War is horrific, which is why international laws of war exist. Hamas commits war crimes as its standard procedure, while Israel is forced into impossible situations to defend itself legally. The reason conducting military operations out of civilian places like schools and hospitals is a war crime is because doing so turns those locations into legitimate military targets.

If you don’t want your refugee camp to be a military target, don’t conduct military operations from the middle of it. Clearly, Hamas got the result it wanted: Dead refugees that it could spin as martyrs to fuel anti-Israel support in the international community.

You’ve bought the terrorists’ propaganda hook, line, and sinker.

I mean… They could form a new, democratic government? This isn’t rocket science. Why are the only choices that current, dysfunctional regimes? They wouldn’t be the first country in living memory to create a new democracy, if they chose to attempt it.

This coverage is biased. Where is the evidence that it was actually the IDF that did this, and not Hamas?