Tell me you’ve never heard of “Anarchism” without telling me.

“Law” has always meant what those who hold authority over its enforcement says it means. Its origins came from whatever the King decreed, as he was the one who held legal authority at the time.

That system was never intended to do anything other than exert an entity’s will over others via threat of physical violence for disobeying. It was never meant to “uphold justice”, “protect the people”, or whatever moralistic tripe the current ruling class who assumed control of its current manifestation says it means and just because a broken clock is right twice a day doesn’t mean the clock works.

We can have mutually agreed upon rules and regulations but that authority to dictate who must follow it has to come from the bottom up. Those who don’t should not be forced into the arrangement against their will but neither should anyone have to associate with those who decide to not abide by it. Other ways of governing ourselves is possible. We know this because history tells us so, as explained by anthropologist David Graeber in many of his works.

This.

Intention be damned if they don’t provide the necessary infrastructure so people can access this at a minimum standard of quality.

I, unfortunately, live out in the boonies and streaming a game with this country bumpkin Internet is impossible.

That kind of authority fundamentally should not exist within a just society.

And that’s how I hurt myself xD

I could eat that entire board in maybe two sittings. One if I wanted to hurt myself.

Holy lack of media literacy, Batman!

Take your own advice, champ.

No, you’re thinking about the fascists. Not those who defend themselves against them.

You lie through your teeth. Fuck your fake concern. Go bite pavement.

“I have annoyed this person with performative politeness and bad faith arguing in support of those who espouse inherently violent rhetoric to the point they told me to fuck off, repeatedly. Now I get to act smug because they don’t maintain an arbitrary decorum.”

Gods you’re a fucking child.

Eat shit and die, fascist sympathizer. Fuck your performative politeness.

Fascist. The term you’re looking for is fascist.

Hope you meet the fate those like you deserve.

Oh fuck of with that disingenuous “people who disagree with you” bullshit.

You’re clearly here in bad faith.

Fuck off, fascist sympathizer.

That’s a problem with the industry and economics that don’t allow for a variety of creative expression, not with the game genre.

What a blatant interpretation of what I said.

It isn’t preemptive. It is direct, self defense against it. They start it by engaging in inherently violent rhetoric. We then tell them to stop spouting their oppressive bullshit. If they don’t, they will be made to stop to defend the community against them and protect those who they are attempting to marginalize.

If you cannot understand this simple explanation, then you cannot be helped or are clearly arguing in bad faith.

Fuck your false dichotomy bullshit.

You can treat the symptoms while working to cure the cause. The two are not mutually exclusive. Each has merit and doing both simultaneously has compounding benefits.

Their “political beliefs” are inherently violent and actively seek to oppress and cause harm to those they deem as “lesser”. Don’t try to downplay this with silvery words.

It doesn’t matter if they are angry and confused when they are actively creating a hostile environment for those they victimize. We first must protect our communities. So, they have two options: stop spouting their bullshit so we can ensure the safety and comfort of our community or be stopped by any means necessary. If they end up dead then they made their choice to die on the hill of supporting oppression.

We should be going after the root cause, yes, but first we must build our communities so that we can have the foundation to do so and we cannot accomplish that while we have fascist supporters actively breaking that community down by spreading their hatred.

Removed by mod