And that’s how I hurt myself xD

I could eat that entire board in maybe two sittings. One if I wanted to hurt myself.

Holy lack of media literacy, Batman!

Take your own advice, champ.

No, you’re thinking about the fascists. Not those who defend themselves against them.

You lie through your teeth. Fuck your fake concern. Go bite pavement.

“I have annoyed this person with performative politeness and bad faith arguing in support of those who espouse inherently violent rhetoric to the point they told me to fuck off, repeatedly. Now I get to act smug because they don’t maintain an arbitrary decorum.”

Gods you’re a fucking child.

Eat shit and die, fascist sympathizer. Fuck your performative politeness.

Fascist. The term you’re looking for is fascist.

Hope you meet the fate those like you deserve.

Oh fuck of with that disingenuous “people who disagree with you” bullshit.

You’re clearly here in bad faith.

Fuck off, fascist sympathizer.

That’s a problem with the industry and economics that don’t allow for a variety of creative expression, not with the game genre.

What a blatant interpretation of what I said.

It isn’t preemptive. It is direct, self defense against it. They start it by engaging in inherently violent rhetoric. We then tell them to stop spouting their oppressive bullshit. If they don’t, they will be made to stop to defend the community against them and protect those who they are attempting to marginalize.

If you cannot understand this simple explanation, then you cannot be helped or are clearly arguing in bad faith.

Fuck your false dichotomy bullshit.

You can treat the symptoms while working to cure the cause. The two are not mutually exclusive. Each has merit and doing both simultaneously has compounding benefits.

Their “political beliefs” are inherently violent and actively seek to oppress and cause harm to those they deem as “lesser”. Don’t try to downplay this with silvery words.

It doesn’t matter if they are angry and confused when they are actively creating a hostile environment for those they victimize. We first must protect our communities. So, they have two options: stop spouting their bullshit so we can ensure the safety and comfort of our community or be stopped by any means necessary. If they end up dead then they made their choice to die on the hill of supporting oppression.

We should be going after the root cause, yes, but first we must build our communities so that we can have the foundation to do so and we cannot accomplish that while we have fascist supporters actively breaking that community down by spreading their hatred.

Removed by mod

Yes it does still collectivize production; it just does so in a decentralized method. You don’t need centralized authority to be a collectivist.

You have no understanding of what anarchism is.

Oh and of course, the lame fallacy that because it failed it means it can never be a thing. Tell me again how that worked out for the communist projects around the world? Oh, right, those imperialist nations totally don’t have clear class distinctions and any day now they will just willfully give up their newly gained authority over the masses… any day now…

Bruh, you’re taking a metaphor at face value instead of just understanding that it is, yes, a simple slogan meant to represent a much larger idea. A very common anarchist slogan, in fact.

It wasn’t meant to be a point. It isn’t an argument against any of what you stated because it isn’t itself an argument. It is just a slogan that represents a more in-depth point.

No, the proletariat cannot just use systems of oppression and hope it withers against its fundamental design. That’s just naive, wishful thinking that doesn’t understand how the system works to reinforce itself.

Tools also depend on their design to function in a specific way. You can try to saw away at a tree with a hammer all day but you’ll never cut it down. So the answer isn’t to use their tools to do something they weren’t designed to do but to build/use different tools altogether.

If you remove the system that allows them to gain authority over necessities and dictate how others access resources that should be communally available then you fundamentally remove their ability to be able to oppress you and your community.

by asking nicely,

I didn’t say you ask nicely. Nice try misrepresenting my argument because you can’t understand it.

What you are literally talking about is that we tried using the tools of the masters and instead of making a better society we just changed who was at the helm of the oppressive system. Thanks for proving my point.

Our ends require dismantling systems that allow for any kind of oppression. You don’t inspire confidence in admitting you just want to be the one doing the oppressing instead.