At this point it wouldn’t even surprise me if they wanna end Xbox in its current form. To my knowledge it’s very low margin if it’s not a net negative, so using other platforms instead to host it would end up with them making more in the long run.
At this point it wouldn’t even surprise me if they wanna end Xbox in its current form. To my knowledge it’s very low margin if it’s not a net negative, so using other platforms instead to host it would end up with them making more in the long run.
Bruh, I read this as ELF instead of EFL and was hoping on learning something interesting about the format.
But then I started the TTS to read out loud and noticed it said E-F-L.
I download noto-fonts{,-{cjk,emoji,extra}}
and ttf-nerd-fonts-symbols{,-mono}
deleted by creator
whatever the Windows App Store is called.
Officially it’s called the “Microsoft Store” but I don’t think anyone really calls it that (Same with the “Windows Explorer” until they renamed it to “File Explorer” as everyone has been calling it)
The entire linux-firmware
package is just a conjuntion of binary blobs from different vendos (one of with is AMD). This is nothing special.
IIRC it’s because they wait for the X.1 release of GNOME before actually updating
I am not entirely sure, but I think it depends on the page if it warns if text is in an input and you want to leave the page.
The GPL only applies to those that get the software that it is applied to. So if I sell you a program FooBar v3.2 under the GPL you have the right to get the source code for FooBar v3.2, which RedHat still does.
But FooCorp only sells you FooBar if you agree to their license, which is independent of the GPL. And should you breach the terms of FooCorps license (redestributing the source of any program they provided you) they cancel your license and can refuse to sell you any further versions of FooBar.
The GPL in this case is still in tact since you can still request the source for FooBar v3.2 and you can do anything you want with it, just the part of redestributing it violates FooCorps license and they refuse to sell you v3.3. But you can still request the source of v3.2 even after the FooCorp license breach.
So… the GPL in technicality is not violated at all (to my knowledge) but maybe in spirit it somewhat is, due to if you want to exercise all the Rights the GPL gives you, you would have to breach FooCorps license.
You misspelled “System and Service Manager”