Re-read my comment, you plonker. I said you don’t have to watch, i.e. having preferences is fine.
If your preference is that people “act straight”, however, I’ll call you out on it.
God, what a fucking moron you are. Such a simple point that you completely failed to grasp.
So a TV then
I didn’t say it’s not a thing, I said it’s not something you really have to worry about with modern displays.
I’d definitely worry about burn-in if you have Teams open for nine hours a day and the taskbar on.
And yet, the testing seems to show that’s not an issue.
I’ve not had a single phone that’s suffered burn in.
Regardless, I’d trust someone who reviews displays for a living over my own anecdote.
Because of the link to Anduril, seemingly.
I really fucking hate these tech bros taking stuff from Tolkien’s mythos to name their products. Tolkien would fucking hate these people and these companies.
LinkedIn is owned by Microsoft. They control the algorithm.
Why would they not do it when time and time and time again customers and lawmakers make explicit that they’re absolutely fine with this behaviour?
There are aftermarket mods to upgrade to a 1080p OLED (which you probably don’t want to do anyway because 1080p is much harder to run)
But you can’t drop the SD OLED’s display into the LCD model, no.
Even then, the concerns are way way way waaaaaay overblown.
Hardware unboxed have been purposely trying to burn in an OLED for thousands of hours, and it’s still barely perceptible even when you’re trying to look for it by taking a picture of the screen then applying filters to make it more visible. In real world usage its effectively impossible.
With any modern OLED display, burn in is something you don’t need to worry about.
Find me a 60", 4K OLED with proper HDR support and ease of wall-mounting that’s anywhere near the price of a TV.
I’d love to buy a monitor and use it like that, but it’s a fantasy.
Imagine complaining about highly informative, IIRC ad-free, high effort videos (that you don’t have to watch, btw) because he complains about industry trends too much and seems a bit camp.
Or did MS pay them to include it, knowing they could hoover up a lot of data, perhaps even with a clause in the contract to also share that data with LG?
This feels like rage bait.
Once again dominated by stardew valley for me
‘White’ isn’t an ethnicity.
“Black” isn’t a single ethnicity either, so by your logic it’s impossible to be racist to them?
Making a small assumption about someone’s hot sauce preferences isn’t racist nor prejudiced; that’s just making a generalization.
Generalising based on someone’s race is racism, surely you know that?
If an Asian walked into my restaurant and I looked him up and down and said “you should probably have the fried rice”, that would be racist.
It doesn’t matter whether there’s “injustice” to the statement, or whether he took offence. It’d still be a racist statement.
Clutch your pearls and continue to desperately vie for offense
The only one doing that here is you. As I’ve already stated, it’s so mild a form of racism that I doubt anybody cares. But it’s still racism. Racism that you feel very passionately should be protected or encouraged.
Christmas wasn’t really a THING in England at that point
??? It absolutely was a thing. A huge thing.
it hadn’t been too long ago that Christmas was banned as a practice in the UK
Christmas celebrations were banned for a 2 year period under Cromwell, almost 200 years earlier. Even then it saw huge backlash and public resistance.
Dickens wrote with the intention of bringing back the Christmases he remembered of his youth
They never went away.
Dickens wrote A Christmas Carol because he was very concerned with the plight of poor people, the working class not having enough time with their families, child labour, and the wealthy keeping all their money to themselves with no regard for those below them.
I truly don’t know where you got the idea from that Christmas wasn’t a thing, that Christmas was banned shortly before, or that Christmas was a thing in Dickens’ youth but not his adulthood.
Do you not notice the “can” in your excerpt?
And no, no, no. Don’t try to play off your chosen definition of racism as the ‘academic’ one, and imply any other definitions are wrong. That’s not how this works.
Literally the first line on Wikipedia, your chosen source:
Racism is the belief that groups of humans possess different behavioral traits corresponding to inherited attributes and can be divided based on the superiority of one race or ethnicity over another.
But here’s some other sources:
The belief that there are different races of people with different characteristics and abilities, and that some races are better than others; a general belief about a whole group of people based only on their race
Harmful or unfair things that people say, do, or think based on the belief that their own race makes them more intelligent, good, moral, etc. than people of other races.
The belief that each race has distinct and intrinsic attributes.
All of these describe this scenario perfectly. I’m not really sure why you’re so ready to defend such a mildly racist situation.
Do you think they just get charged without any evidence?
Judging someone’s personality or their likes/dislikes by their ethnicity is definitely racist, I don’t see how you could possibly argue it isn’t?
Of course it’s a bit racist, but not offensive. Nobody’s going to be losing sleep over someone assuming they can’t handle spice based on their skin colour.
Huh?
Micron is one of the big three DRAM producers.
And the South Koreans aren’t lowering production, unless you mean DRAM specifically in favour of HBM for the datacentre/AI market (which is what they are doing), that would be crazy given the level of demand, it’d just let competitors take the market. Samsung and SK Hynix are expanding fabs, but they’re not expected to be operational until 2027.
Blatant misinformation being upvoted lol