even if they shut it down later, it would be worth it to have it for some amount of time.

that’s insanely shitty

You aren’t paralyzed from the neck down

You aren’t paralyzed from the neck down

It’s like 40 min long, it’s worth it but maybe not if you have to debug

crashing more means nothing about the safety of the car and everything about the safety of the average driver of the car, unless the manufacturer is directly at fault for the crash somehow. This is an unfixable problem and has nothing to do with whether it was gas or electric. The variables were not isolated at all.

No I did not see that, link me to it? I can’t find it, a primary source please.

also i’m fairly certain such meat wouldn’t do anything? have you ever had animal meat? it would also have such chemicals and be mostly indistinguishable in terms of adrenaline content. You’d just digest it?

“Adrenochrome is mass produced and commercially available to the public, and is not a controlled substance.”

so you can just… get it without that?

Yo get mental health help, I didn’t have to check to know this is nonsense.

Edit: I had to check because come on this is too insane https://sd.vern.cc/fact-check/hillary-clinton-snuff-film/?__goaway_challenge=resource-load&__goaway_id=e86d8500f91b2d7477ab5ae610211f9a&__goaway_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fduckduckgo.com%2F

Edit2: I genuinely wish you luck on your mental health journey. I’m sorry you’re going through this

also adrenochrome can easily be made adrenaline is readily available I dunno why you’d get it this way??

The original definition of state is different from the western nuspeak one that means government

the point being that there will be government, just horizontally managed.

They are not adjusting their models at any cost to other benchmarks. Especially when the benchmark isn’t even public. This would be very easily caught.

no, they don’t have agi, but this benchmark isn’t proof of that either way, an ai that’s dumber than a human could still be agi

They get 85% on the last benchmark, this one was specifically designed to stump them, when the last one came out everyone said the same things as this go around.

will anyone be retracting their statements when they get to 85% on this one?

Can you tell me how to reverse sort a list in python?

He gives people brain aneurysms all the time but chose not to give these fuckers one?

If it hits that It’ll go much higher very quickly, linuxes problems are literally all related to marketshare or need a few more years of ironing out the wayland transition… which by then will likely be done.

CentOS has nothing to do with that and existed no more or less at the whims of its company than any other distro run by a specific group of maintainers, if the manjaro corp failed the exact same thing would happen to it.

If you don’t like the immutability then use nobara.

Tbh I don’t think the issues with immutability are CURRENTLY there.

you said this:

“Entirely community-driven (so suffer much less from corporate influence, and are better from the Linux “freedom” standpoint compared to Fedora, OpenSUSE, etc.)”

give me one example of a time this mattered

“Widely adopted (have extensive communities supporting the repos, a large knowledge base and active forums)”

fedora obviously has this.

“Not heavily opinionated (allow proprietary programs, work with systemd, etc.)” And this.

i conclude that you have still not made any case that there is even one reason to use manjaro that isn’t the cost of switching.

that’s not an argument to what I said in fact it’s basically exactly what I said, manjaro users only use manjaro because it’s what they’re already using, not because it’s better designed for any particular usecase.

“There’s literally no reason to use this distro that isn’t just that you’re already used to it.” Was exactly what I said.

you’re right, I oversimplified, bazzite is great because it’s unhindered by patents and preinstalls the drivers, I’d recommend a community fedora fork, the key being that it’s much easier to turn fedora into this than arch.

manjaro is this but with way more footguns, I say this having maintained a bunch of manjaro systems for people, switching them to bazzite fixed nearly all of my maintenance burden, because it’s easy to remove them from fedora but impossible with arch, intentionally, and by design.

If you want something easy that just works arch is very deliberately designed to not be that, on purpose, even.

If you want slightly faster stable then you probably want something like https://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Slowroll

which does exactly that but has a competent team backing it.

or even fedora, really.

My recommendation for someone that needs an appstore with a gui is fedora, manjaro is terrible for this, because they have an appstore that regularly breaks and requires cli intervention anyway, if having a gui for package management is important to you manjaro is a terrible choice, as is arch in general.

read some of the comments here, this is not uncommon, and it’s a fundamental issue with the design of arch package management that has been completely resolved elsewhere.

No, I do not agree at all that that is a valid usecase for manjaro. Anybody who needs a distro that works out of the box and is convenient shouldn’t even be considering anything arch based.

That’s normal most distros do that, what does manjaro do better than others? You have not made any sort of case for why manjaro is better.

you fall under “haven’t thought about distros philosophies”

you did not actually compare anything, what you discovered is that manjaro works… but so does everything else so that’s not a valid comparison, usless you can point to distros that don’t work and why