helping to moderate the autonomous zone :dome:
🏴☠️ market anarchist
😎 a pinch of the unique :stirner:
🕹️ odd games and lofi 3d, quake
🌱 interested in food systems, economics, web revival
💸 everything is free software if you steal the source code
@serenity @Tiuku
2 which is also kind of okay if we take the license more as a fun manifesto or art piece in its self. but to use it as a “real” license would mean you hope one day to use it in the statist legal system and i really question the legitimacy it would have there.
is the problem with free or open source licenses that capitalists can also use them? or is it the legal system of privileges that creates capitalists and conditions of poverty in the first place?
@serenity @Tiuku im not in the original thread but ive come across this license in other contexts. i have two main objections:
1 if its really about something critical of capitalism then i dont vibe much with the way that is phrased. its got a confused idea about capitalism and theres phrases (like non members setting the cost of their labor) that are totally mistaken about terminology and econ.
@rysiek hear hear! growing at people-scale for the value of the actual people involved, nodes coming in and blinking out as load and social disputes change the landscape of federation, new UI and social customs emerging organically, successfully resisting the VC mindset by just doing our own thing distributed!