You may wanna re-read my comment—I did not bring up cut scenes, or claim Naughty Dog games don’t have enough gameplay sections.

My point was Naughty Dog’s gameplay sections are uninspired, non innovative, and passable at best because they’re more interested in telling a story than innovative gameplay.

Whether I like narrative-driven games or not is of no relevance.

Maybe not the length of the main campaign, but good luck 100%ing Cartherine, holy shit. Nevermind Full Body. There’s like 8 endings combined + insane challenges and 64-stage game within the game. +100 hours easy, if not more.

Makes sense. Why they’re not marketing more towards their growing Linux-based buyers is beyond me.

It’s all relative. Mediocre is still better than garbage, but not necessarily interesting or innovative. It’s just “fine” because the whole point of the gameplay in these games is to progress the narrative forward. Mastery is rarely, if ever, required and gameplay depth is of no interest to players or developers.

You ignore all of that and start comparing their catalog to Ubisoft pumping out generic trash for years (NGL that Prince of Persia game is sick though) and you get a much brighter picture that doesn’t necessarily take all factors into account.

Personally, I play games for the hyper engagement they offer, which I expect from hobbies and cannot get from film or literature. Stories, on the other hand, I can find elsewhere, so I don’t necessarily care for them that much in games.

Again, it’s all relative.

I’m more excited about Kamiya’s comeback and the Clovers drop. Noway Capcom let him do that without plans to revive Viewtiful Joe and God Hand.

In other words, Mikami comeback when.

I was gonna say “Yeah, they have a good track record making playable movies.” But that’s not fair to Jak and Crash.

Still, they haven’t made anything with interesting gameplay since like 2004.