oooh. now do economics!!

anarchism historically has not succeeded

what is your measure for success? I think liberating people from oppression is the standard, an anarchism has a great track record.

now you’re moving the goalposts

this is just a denial that anarchist and communist societyies function. you’re shifting the goalposts

Moscow isn’t a city state

what city could have survived an attack from France? none. you will never find any true Scotsman.

being invaded by a superpower is not an indictment of a societal structure

more no true scotsmanning​

it’s an anarchist community of 55,000

seems like you’re no true scotsmanning.

say what you want to say

invaded by imperial france

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stateless_societies?wprov=sfla1

the swamp maroons

exarcheia

the Paris commune

those can’t exist in actual human communities of more than about a dozen people.

this is a lie.

under communism, there is no exploitation

so there is no one “at the top” “exploiting people at the bottom”

Whatever “ism” you use, there will always be people at the top who are exploiting people at the bottom.

communism is classless. there is no top or bottom. same with anarchism.

this hasn’t been a conversation for hours