no, not the atari game. a random movie that came out last year with the same name. a movie kn 2017, 2962 and 1948 also used this title… because its a word.

…

because pitfall is a normal word and this movie wasnt about the game.

neither was the 2017 , 1962, or 1948 movie

deleted by creator

this worries me with any tech.

1. if a smaller company dvelopes a competing product (openai and anthropic used to be small) will it hinder them and provide access to only the mion stream companies?

2. how does this affect non-us models?

3. will they only be approved if they say wonderful things about trump? have you ever asked grok about elon?

i started there, like lemmy, i also sign into piefed. its just different software connecting to the fediverse

It was 100% about the web. But to be clear, for this conversation we have to be pedantic. when i say web, i mean the world wide web, the service that runs on the application layer of the internet. I am not talking about the internet itself. I was working as a software developer and a lot of people thought web pages weren’t going anywhere. AOL was how people accessed online but there were competing products to the WWW, the biggest competitor was gopher. Web pages were not as functional at first and were seen as a fad, like an online business card. So yes people doubted the WWW app/tech itself.

which wont affect anything mentioned in this article. you do realize when the dotcom bubble bursted, the web didnt gonaway. we actually do buy pet food online now. (seeling pet food was thr last thing before the burst)

its just the small companies that popped up trying tk ride the wave will go away. the crazy hardware ramp up will die down. anthropic isnt going anywhere

it surprises me that anyone disagrees with this. i am not anti ai at all but why would we hand out awards to ao generated stuff? whats the accomplishmennt?

i should have said the west. iran has called out the uk.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/iran-issues-chilling-threat-uk-36903494

they already bombed amazon for no financial gain.

https://apnews.com/article/amazon-aws-data-center-uae-iran-bahrain-71066b0a822c4cfd88b61e3fe79af917

why did you think it was fake?

https://www.pcmag.com/news/pro-iran-hackers-hit-ubuntus-canonical-with-ddos-float-extortion-demand

https://www.theregister.com/2026/05/01/canonical_confirms_ubuntu_infrastructure_under/

its their continued attack on american companies

since its a terrotist atrack from iran… no

i think most people just don’t care. we really need to spread the message. i think getting reddit users on piefed and lemmy is a good start. (like your username btw)

i want to spread the word so bad but i was banned from reddit. never knew why and i was very curious and surprised until i found out Paul McCartney was banned for posting pictures of his concert. so now i know it could have been anything.

favebook is another matter. i may have never had an account but i love tech history. mark and the gang built tools to scrape you other account back in the day an add the data to facebook. made it easy to switch. they also made it close to impossible to do the same to facebook. but it would require something like that to get people on to something else.

ok… soap box rant tangent time…

i am so pissed all the governments have been stepping up this age check anti vpn anti privacy push. in my magical completely unrealistic paradise world, we would have public service annpuncents about how to self host and be a part of the solution. i am so just disenchanted with society (not sure if thats the best term). i feel like it was only two years ago where i feel the bad stuff was selling our data to advertisers. sure the nsa kept illegally spying on us but the EFF would fight them in court.

now its so much worse :(

deleted by creator

no. i am going to slightly contradict my earlier hyperbole but microsoft was formed by bill gates and paul allen to work with altair. ibm was not involved then. this is why i have serious doubts about historical events because even things that happened during my lifetime are being altered

debating Microsoft’s business practices, which we we all know were shady as fuck, is veering away from the point that ibm’s loss of the home market is ibm’s fault. ibm never saw the home market as a lucrative avenue

are we rewriting history? “and then bill gates came along”. microsoft was with ibm since the beginning of the home market? microsoft was formed to work with ibm. microsoft is older than apple. microsoft was initially pushing os/2 but ibm wasnt interested in the home market so microsoft ripped off xerox like apple did. but the article was about ibm shifting focus away from the home market and that happened before 1993 (doom 1)

i looked it up. i was counting the 2168 as one model but i guess there were ten variations. but your answers dont seem real. you sound like a young person who didnt buy a pc. we didnt buy pcs from sears. are you using ai?

they were not “veryuch in the home pc market” they released the ps/1 to “reenter” the home market. the ps/2 was older. and never had a 486dx 2. th ps/1 had one 486dc2. so yes its possible but tjis article is about ibm losing the home market and they lost it by then, since the ps/1 was them trying one last time to “reeneter” it.

ypur back hurtd? eithrr your too young to rdmrmber or your so old your brain is making stuff up. what ibm 486dx? by thr time intel released the 486dx, ibm was already replaced by clones. hp, compaq, gateway

the problem is, a lot of shitty laws are passing in europe (looking at you france) but havent made it through our system yet. time will tell.