• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    Your comment is itself misleading ironically since the whole point is to have a self sustaining fusion reaction. The lasers are only needed to start the reaction. Meanwhile, you’re making it sound as if sustained laser output is needed.

    • poVoq
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      In this specific case of reactor type it probably is. As far as I understand the plan is to make a lot of these small fuel-pellets and shoot them with lasers, each being used up in the process.

      Other fusion reactor types do indeed try to sustain a pulsed (tokamak) or continuous (wendelstein) plasma, but then you end up having huge additional energy costs in the form of magnetic confinement and currently also cooling these magnets to super-conducting temperatures. See the video that @Peter1986c@lemmy.ml posted below.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        The energy cost for sustained plasma is reduced dramatically now that room temperature superconductors are now possible. This was basically the main limiting factor for positive energy output.

        • poVoq
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Hence my “currently” in the above comment. I am carefully optimistic that Wendelstein-X based fusion reactor designs might at some point generate net energy output, but we are still far from achieving this, and sensationalist missleading headlines are not part of getting there.