• B1ackmath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s also terrible compared to the first switch’s screen though.

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Except other testers found it to be ~4ms faster than the switch 1, in tests where they actually give their methodology.

      Monitors unboxed just went “yeah it’s 30+ms, source: trust me bro”

    • .Donuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yeah it’s not good, it’s just a weird thing to put in the headline. It’s like comparing a new hatchback with its competition, but then also say it’s slower than the newest Ferrari. I think that should be a given as it’s a fraction of the price