Electing judges doesn’t really make sense to me. Are people supposed to dig up every court case they’ve ruled on? (Or for prospective new judges, every case they’ve represented in as a lawyer?)
(I’m in USA Btw; Does any other country even “elect” judges? Such a weird thing IMO.)
Any backers if there are any, searching their name online to see about controversial decisions.
And then I default to replacing them. Most people vote to keep the status quo… I’d rather keep them on their toes.