Gollum@feddit.org to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 10 days agoLucky enough, I am C++ Developerfeddit.orgimagemessage-square115fedilinkarrow-up1483arrow-down135
arrow-up1448arrow-down1imageLucky enough, I am C++ Developerfeddit.orgGollum@feddit.org to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 10 days agomessage-square115fedilink
minus-squareJankatarch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-210 days agoI mixed digraphs and initilization together.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-210 days agoOh, I didn’t know about digraphs at all. C++ is a really big language. And wow, that’s a well hidden footgun.
minus-squareulterno@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoFeels like this thing should require an extra flag in case of gcc in this day and age, or a separate compile-time defined variable, specifically for cases where you don’t want to require the flag.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 days agoTo be fair, the biggest footguns are the trigraphs, and now that I tested those do require a flag in gcc. The digraphs are just hard to search, never used operator symbols.
I mixed digraphs and initilization together.
Oh, I didn’t know about digraphs at all. C++ is a really big language.
And wow, that’s a well hidden footgun.
Feels like this thing should require an extra flag in case of
gccin this day and age, or a separate compile-time defined variable, specifically for cases where you don’t want to require the flag.To be fair, the biggest footguns are the trigraphs, and now that I tested those do require a flag in gcc.
The digraphs are just hard to search, never used operator symbols.