This image was created by /u/kuebic@discuss.tchncs.de for this comment here: https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/21735989. I had encouraged them to post it somewhere, but as far as I can tell, they never did.

Panel 1: “Installing Windows 20 years ago” screenshot of install wizard with just a couple buttons
Panel 2: “Installing Linux 20 years ago” screenshot of a busy command line
Panel 3: “Installing Windows today” screenshot of a busy command line
Panel 4: “Installing Linux today” screenshot of install wizard with just a couple buttons

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Me too!

      XP was what sent me running looking for an alternative. Nearly landed on IRIX, until I found the GNU GPL to read.

    • Cabbage_Pout61@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Maybe you had a specific experience with It, but XP was and is considered universally a good windows version, compared to its predecessors and the posterior Vista. Only losing to windows 7 when it launched.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Security was awful, multi user wasn’t, windows started the Microsoft id program with it, they lied about removing programs with an apllication that only hid them, they tied music downloads to explorer only, and that’s only the tip of the iceberg.

        It was a nasty looking mess, got hacked in 10 minutes if you put it on the internet until service pack 3, and in person it wouldn’t last 3 minutes.

        That’s leaving out the crazy licensing programs they introduced.

        It was really, really bad. But since a lot of people knew nothing before it, they look back at it with rose colored glasses. It was truly garbage.

        • Cabbage_Pout61@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yes it had very bad flaws, which didn’t discourage its wide range of use. One can say it’s not objectively good, but it’s subjectively not bad.

          As I answered below, it was part of the “good guys” versions of windows, not receive popular backlash like windows ME, 8 and 11

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        So if you’re correct with that, that NewNewAugustEast and I find it intolerably bad means we must exist outside the universe?

        Is this what happens… to the perception of those who remained with windows, those who escaped to FOSS, apparently just ceased to exist?

        • Cabbage_Pout61@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Nothing of the sort, just said it based on the general usage, for all the flaws it had, It was, undeniably a very popular and used piece of software.

          At the time of its peak, it was not universally bashed against like Windows ME, 8 or Vista. It was well received like windows 95, 7 and10

          • Digit@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            57 minutes ago

            Oh, sorry. I must have had a dyslexic moment and misread:

            considered universally

            as

            “universally considered”