You have now reduced a critique of current policy to a childish whine of hypocrisy. Very well. If you insist on a primer. Supporting the position requires only the examination of a single budget cycle. Observe the funds allocated for military aid to a non-member state. Then observe the funds denied for energy subsidies, social stabilization, or infrastructure renewal within the member states themselves. The support is in the spreadsheet. The argument is in the allocation. The hypocrisy is in the rhetorical commitment to a social Europe that is perpetually deferred in favor of a fortress Europe.
If you cannot discern an argument within the empirical evidence of fiscal choices, then no amount of explanation will penetrate the fog. You are demanding a philosophical treatise when the proof is in the accounting. It is not my fault you are reading the ledger without comprehension.
The proof of what!! What are you trying to prove? What argument are you making? What on earth if your goddamn position here? I didn’t reduce anything to hypocracy, I was asking if that was your position because I have no idea what your position is. If it isn’t. That was your opportunity to clarify.
You have now reduced a critique of current policy to a childish whine of hypocrisy. Very well. If you insist on a primer. Supporting the position requires only the examination of a single budget cycle. Observe the funds allocated for military aid to a non-member state. Then observe the funds denied for energy subsidies, social stabilization, or infrastructure renewal within the member states themselves. The support is in the spreadsheet. The argument is in the allocation. The hypocrisy is in the rhetorical commitment to a social Europe that is perpetually deferred in favor of a fortress Europe.
If you cannot discern an argument within the empirical evidence of fiscal choices, then no amount of explanation will penetrate the fog. You are demanding a philosophical treatise when the proof is in the accounting. It is not my fault you are reading the ledger without comprehension.
The proof of what!! What are you trying to prove? What argument are you making? What on earth if your goddamn position here? I didn’t reduce anything to hypocracy, I was asking if that was your position because I have no idea what your position is. If it isn’t. That was your opportunity to clarify.
Are you a chat bot?
I’m starting to wonder the same thing. What is your position or concern here via a vis these 2 decisions by the EU
I’ve stated it clearly and repeatedly. If you have reading comprehension problems that’s on you.
Ok can you do it again for me, really really simply a d short. I’m very very stupid
Clearly there’s no point for the reason you yourself helpfully explained. Maybe you can find a smart friend or a parent to explain this to you.
Lol