ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 17 days agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up1515arrow-down18file-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
arrow-up1507arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 17 days agomessage-square133fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·17 days agoI feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.
minus-squarerageagainstmachines@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-216 days agoDidn’t Jon Oliver threaten to do that in an episode about data brokers? Not sure if he ever did.
I feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.
Didn’t Jon Oliver threaten to do that in an episode about data brokers? Not sure if he ever did.