JoYo@lemmy.ml to Fediverse@lemmy.ml · 3 年前For my Fediversery, a reminder that NSA and CIA were probably on the fedi before you werewww.vice.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down15
arrow-up116arrow-down1external-linkFor my Fediversery, a reminder that NSA and CIA were probably on the fedi before you werewww.vice.comJoYo@lemmy.ml to Fediverse@lemmy.ml · 3 年前message-square23fedilink
minus-squareThe Doctor@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 年前NSA? Yes. CIA? Probably not. They don’t have that kind of imagination. c.f., the internal parody of The Hunt for Red October they declassified about a decade ago.
minus-squareThe Doctor@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 年前I don’t think JWICS is DoD only. In theory, any TLA or FLA that handles TS material, has a SCIF and a local JWICS LAN can’t be hooked into the rest of the JWICS network.
minus-squareJoYo@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 年前I thought NSA had a completely different one called Tapioca. /shrug
minus-squareThe Doctor@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 年前It wouldn’t surprise me. The definitely have a need for their own entirely separate network.
NSA? Yes. CIA? Probably not. They don’t have that kind of imagination. c.f., the internal parody of The Hunt for Red October they declassified about a decade ago.
fair, I think JWICS was for DoD only.
I don’t think JWICS is DoD only. In theory, any TLA or FLA that handles TS material, has a SCIF and a local JWICS LAN can’t be hooked into the rest of the JWICS network.
I thought NSA had a completely different one called Tapioca. /shrug
It wouldn’t surprise me. The definitely have a need for their own entirely separate network.