• MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Feminism isn’t just about women.
    Toxic masculinity isn’t caused just by men.
    Black Lives Matter isn’t just about black lives.
    “Believe women” isn’t about blindly believing what women say. “Christian charity” is the least charitable thing in the world.
    “Defund the police” and “abolish the police” aren’t about eliminating police forces and letting crime run rampant.
    AI is anything but intelligent.
    “Global Warming” sounds tame for what’s actually happening: “climate disruption” and “climate catastrophe”. A bunch of countries with “communist” or “democratic” in their names are anything but.

    Words are stupid. Slogans are lazy. People lie.

    Which is why I like the lyrics of ‘Enjoy the Silence’ so much.

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The craziest part here is that the primary goal of these movements isn’t to actually achieve their objectives, but to virtue signal. If all it took to get a huge chunk of the population on your side was to change your messaging a bit, then any reasonable movement would jump at such a low hanging fruit of an opportunity to advance their cause… but they don’t. These movements would really rather sacrifice optics and stall their movements than accept some criticism and adapt.

      • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Hmm, this is an interesting line of thought. I’ve always thought these movements are dominated by left leaning people and the left usually understands the importance of inclusive wording. So why do they use such exclusive labels?

        Surely many people do try to jump at that low hanging fruit and adopt more inclusive labels. But, I guess it’s not an idea that spreads so easily? These movements must rely on people with strong feelings on specific issues and have to target them with a label they can identify with. I guess the more moderate majority would associate with other terms, but don’t have the motivation to take much action in the name of it.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Every single line item in your comment became ammunition for foreign agents to get into our culture over the last 20 years and just escalate the FUCK out of both sides of each idea there.

      It was directly from the KGB handbook written over 50 years ago, that if you infiltrate a nation’s culture and just amplify the most radical takes of both sides of every issue, it will create so much chaos and completely destabilize a culture so that people tune out and stop trusting each other or any news story they read. This has the effect of making the population just default to whatever state media they see and stop caring about social issues entirely. It’s been shocking seeing how effectively it’s played out in the US.

      I watched it happen, I was on the frontlines, managing a few social sites and moderating a huge subreddit about relationships. It was a creeping infection at first, but eventually it was like Helm’s Deep, but instead of orcs outside, it was astroturfers, crybullies, sea lions, and the entire goddamn ZOO of bad-actors and subversive chuds. For every horrible, shit-mouthed incel ranting about how women need to be put in cages, there was also some delusional, insane “feminist” screaming about how all men are rapists and men should never be left alone with children.

      I gave up the fight, reddit banned me for being an involved human, but it continues to this day, getting worse by the day.

      • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        i’d dissapoint you, but the thing the prevous commenter listed are not unique to America nor the western world. It’s not the KGB necessarily, it’s just how the manipulations work. You don’t have to read KGB books to apply them

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I didn’t even say it was the KGB doing it entirely, just that it was first documented as a “thing” in their manual from decades ago, and we still didn’t do anything to protect our society broadly from it.

          I know well that we’ve been under assault from an absolute charcuterie board of forces both foreign and domestic. Twitter alone is like the Ukraine war, in that it re-wrote how we thought modern tactics are going to unfold, people are going to writing manuals about how to do what Musk has done with that platform.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I watched it happen because I saw it happening and read the (too few) news reports that pointed out that it was indeed happening.

        But it’s like climate change. It seems to go in one ear and out the other for the vast majority of the population.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The fact that our species has a glaring weakness in identifying abstract threats, while at the same time we’re developing tools capable of performing the most abstract possible attacks on our free-will and agency, makes me feel a tad uncomfy about the near term future.

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            Well as long as you’ve correctly identified the KGB and Russia Russia Russia, your job is done.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          while the techniques were pioneered and written down by the KGB, I’m not even saying the blame lay on Russia alone. There are a lot of forces adopting this tactic, both foreign and domestic.

          Wait 'til you learn about Twitter.

          • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Oh no, won’t anyone think of the poor Kremlin!!! They can get fucked. I want to see the Kremlin in its current form crash and burn.

          • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            What are you even talking about?

            The KREMLIN and Russia as a country should be no more. Who talked about a genocide?

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            15 hours ago

            No, see, we are good persons, and they are bad, so when they do genocide, it’s bad, because they’re bad, but when we do it, it’s good, because we’re good!

              • Aqarius@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                14 hours ago

                …Y’know what, let’s try and dumb this down a bit, middle school style:

                1. The post you’re replying to accentuates the words good and bad. Why is that?
                2. When the post talks about actions, what adjectives are used to describe them? How does that relate to the actors doing them? What is the causal relation implied?
                3. The action used in the post is genocide - why is that, in particular used as an example? Is the post justifying genocide? What does the example of genocide mean for the causal relation implied?
                4. What is the opinion of the author on the sentiments expressed in the post?
                5. Does the post take a stance on real-world political actors? Does the post even mention any? If so, does it justify them, or condemn them?