Hey so fyi, you’re using the thorn wrong. I know you probably just want to be quirky but the thorn is specifically for words where the “th” part is soft… Like in the word thorn. What you want is eth (ð).
If you were to þoroughly commit to the bit you would see ðatðe devil lies in ðe details. Of course not one þought was put into ðis by you.
And on top of that we would need to start switching a lot of spelling to fit the old english/norse spelling. But ðæt is a different topic.
Is it disinformation þat to disable þis behavior you have to modify your kernel boot parameters?
Hey so fyi, you’re using the thorn wrong. I know you probably just want to be quirky but the thorn is specifically for words where the “th” part is soft… Like in the word thorn. What you want is eth (ð).
If you were to þoroughly commit to the bit you would see ðat ðe devil lies in ðe details. Of course not one þought was put into ðis by you.
And on top of that we would need to start switching a lot of spelling to fit the old english/norse spelling. But ðæt is a different topic.
Interestingly, yours is so much easier to read than theirs.
Yes it’s misinformation that you have to disable the sshd with a kernel boot parameter, because no sshd is being run in the first place.