• El_Rocha@lm.put.tf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    So would then other people be rotated in order to fill the positions of the people already being rotated and so on?

    • SolarNialamide@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      You could do that. You could also make it a bit more nuanced, where the pool of people only consists of people doing non-vital work. So maybe doctors and nuclear engineers and firefighters and teachers could be excluded, while only people doing non-vital work get rotated in, and it wouldn’t be such a big deal if one person is missing for a couple of weeks or months. Nobody is gonna die if you have to wait a bit longer to get your hair cut or your house painted or to see that new movie, and there would be an understanding that you have to wait a bit longer because important work is being done. You’d also have so many people who are freed up from useless or destructive work like ceo’s, finance, middle managers, marketing, etc that maybe you wouldn’t even notice if someone got rotated in, because everyone else could just pick up like 3 extra hours a week for a little while.

      • El_Rocha@lm.put.tf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you divide between people working vital and non-vital work, aren’t you creating two distinct classes where the system is supposed to eliminate all classes?