It is nice to know your comment/post are appreciated!

  • Boinketh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well if you had karma, it definitely would be dropping lol. The karma system was a mistake because it incentivised spam and karma-whoring.

    • ooli@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That"s the dark side of karma. I believe it have some good side too.

      • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The good side is really small, in comparison with the bad side.

        If you want to amass karma, it’s better to pump out low-effort content, that users see and upvote out of habit. If however you want to contribute with a community, high-effort content is generally preferable; specially reposts of highly upvoted posts. As such, even if karma promotes activity, it’ll promote the sort of activity that ends as noise, for most people in the community.

        The above will need to be addressed by moderators, who have a bigger pressure to implement rules against low-effort content. That means that non-mod users need to follow bigger rulesets, and increases the workload for the mods.

        Karma reinforces echo chambers, as users with more karma are seen as “more authoritative”. As such, it has a chilling effect on divergent opinions - because people don’t want to lose that façade of authoritativeness. And this snowballs really fast because people voicing those divergent opinions will get lower karma, and be seen as less authoritative, thus the opinion is seen as less trustable than the one promoted by the echo chamber. (Note that this affects even fluff opinions like “it’s fine to say ‘animes’” or “I like pineapple on my pizza”.)

        In a certain defunct site, karma raised concerns about moderators misusing their mod powers to remove posts from other users, and then repost them to amass karma. Or users spamming a legit post with reports, through bots, to get rid of it. This can be generalise into “once you set up karma as a goal, some people will use shitty ways to reach that goal”.

        Specially assumptive = stupid moderators are prone to assume too much out of karma. Low karma should mean only “people in general don’t like what this person posts/comments”; and yet those assumers often treat it as “low karma = troll” or “low karma = shitposter”.

        In another comment, you said:

        But ir might be concerning that Lemmy doesnt incentive activity somehow .

        I don’t think that encouraging activity is “bad” (far from that!), but that karma is the wrong way to do it.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Intentionally, Lemmy itself doesn’t total your upvotes and downvotes. You can go to your profile and see them for a given comment or post, but not an overall total. Some apps do show it.

    Most of us agree that Reddit karma caused people to post and say things just for the karma, which was an overall negative. People put too much value in the score. So while we have upvotes and downvotes, they’re deemphasized, and that’s on purpose.

    • ooli@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My post was mostly lighthearted. But ir might be concerning that Lemmy doesnt incentive activity somehow . Aggregators are as good as how many people participate

  • Thteven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re serious some of the apps track vote counts though it seems like it resets every once in a while.

      • DougHolland@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve been here a month after 15 years at the other place, and it’s an improvement.

        Sorry you got clusterbombed, though. You asked a fair question, something I wondered too when I first got here.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s no karma, only post/comment score.

    Karma is often a perverse incentive; in theory it’s supposed to encourage good quality content, but in practice it encourages unnecessary reposts + barely acceptable (but easy to judge) content.

  • AutoModerator@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This message is to inform you that your account will not be able to post/comment in the next 24 hours due to the negative karma accumulated from this post:

    https://lemmy.ml/post/2337679

    This is a cool-down period to allow you to think how your future contributions will be constructive and positive.

    Repeat infractions may escalate to a permanent ban!

    • DougHolland@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bad bot. OP is a newbie asking an honest question, and for that they get booted by a bot?

      It would make sense to notify a human mod when a post is drowning in downvotes like this one, but it’s a mistake to trust the bot to hand out suspensions.

  • Lexam@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Accumulated karma is not officially tracked. You can however see how many up votes and down votes you have on your posts and comments in the profile section.